I: The Reentry Crisis
Challenges for the formerly incarcerated
According to recent national statistics, about 725,000
individuals are released from prisons and millions
more cycle through jails each year, a volume of formerly
incarcerated people reentering society never before
seen.
A complex set of factors renders these individuals
vulnerable to relapse to criminal activity, resulting in
disturbingly high rates of recidivism. Nationwide, two
integration into society are that the formerly incarcerated,
physically or mentally disabled, undereducated and
lacking in vocational skills and experience, and have
returns home to communities that are challenged by
high unemployment, poverty and crime and lack reentry
Compounding this grave situation is the fact that this
unprecedented volume of released individuals increases
homelessness. On average across the country, more than
and the percentages are higher in large urban areas such
which receive the bulk of the formerly incarcerated and
statistics are especially worrisome in light of studies
to stay safe and healthy, clean and sober, apply for jobs
The formerly incarcerated face considerable barriers to
may be unwilling or unable to house them or, in some cases,
home is not safe. Private housing is typically priced beyond
their means, and the landlords discriminate against those
with criminal records. Those recently released often cannot
avail themselves of housing programs for the homeless,
homelessness. As for public housing, a combination
of federal and local policies excludes many with criminal
www.ojp.usdoj.gov/newsroom/pressrelease/2009/
. The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), a
trends at the state level for a variety of criminal justice related and
prisoner reentry issues. To access information on such trends and
statistics, visit www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/reentry/reentry.htm.
housing to a variety of categories of people, including
Making matters worse is that no government agency is
jurisdictionally charged with ownership of the problems
of recidivism and homelessness among the formerly
incarcerated: Corrections and criminal justice agencies
view their responsibility to the incarcerated population
reentry services, including housing, does not fall under the
purview of any other federal or state agency (Rodriguez
organizationally to deal with the pressing need to keep
Growing Interest in Supportive Housing
Against this grim background, there is hope. There
is a changing climate of greater receptiveness among
policymakers to support programs that promote
successful reentry, thereby avoiding the huge costs of
attention is being directed in particular at “supportive
p.5).
2
Supportive housing programs provide stable and
safe housing to homeless formerly incarcerated men and
women alongside comprehensive and individualized
services, such as education and vocational training,
employment assistance and counseling, substance abuse
treatment, access to medical and mental health care, family
directed at promoting independent living and reintegration
growing evidence that supportive housing for homeless
formerly incarcerated persons reduces recidivism, makes
2 “Supportive housing,” as a term, came into widespread use
under the Homeless Assistance Act, created the Supportive Housing
Demonstration Program. In its broadest sense, it is housing that is
linked with social services tailored to those with special needs who
face the threat of homelessness, whether because of substance abuse,
HIV/AIDS, domestic violence, former incarceration, chronic mental
3