includes individual words, sentence struc-
ture, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
The best way to approach the
macrostructure revision is through the out-
line of the ideas in your paper. The last time
you updated your outline was before writing
the Introduction and the Discussion. Now
that you have the beginning and the conclu-
sion, you can take a bird’s-eye view of the
whole paper. The outline will allow you to
see if the ideas of your paper are coherently
structured, if your results are logically built,
and if the discussion is linked to the research
question in the Introduction. You will be
able to see if something is missing in any of
the sections or if you need to rearrange your
information to make your point.
The next step is to revise each of the sec-
tions starting from the beginning. Ideally, you
should limit yourself to working on small sec-
tions of about five pages at a time [14]. After
these short sections, your eyes get used to
your writing and your efficiency in spotting
problems decreases. When reading for con-
tent and organization, you should control
your urge to edit your paper for sentence
structure and grammar and focus only on the
flow of your ideas and logic of your presen-
tation. Experienced researchers tend to make
almost three times the number of changes to
meaning than novice writers [15,16]. Revis-
ing is a difficult but useful skill, which aca-
demic writers obtain with years of practice.
In contrast to the macrostructure revi-
sion, which is a linear process and is done
usually through a detailed outline and by
sections, microstructure revision is a non-
linear process. While the goal of the
macrostructure revision is to analyze your
ideas and their logic, the goal of the mi-
crostructure editing is to scrutinize the form
of your ideas: your paragraphs, sentences,
and words. You do not need and are not rec-
ommended to follow the order of the paper
to perform this type of revision. You can
start from the end or from different sections.
You can even revise by reading sentences
backward, sentence by sentence and word
by word.
One of the microstructure revision
strategies frequently used during writing
center consultations is to read the paper
aloud [17]. You may read aloud to yourself,
to a tape recorder, or to a colleague or friend.
When reading and listening to your paper,
you are more likely to notice the places
where the fluency is disrupted and where
you stumble because of a very long and un-
clear sentence or a wrong connector.
Another revision strategy is to learn
your common errors and to do a targeted
search for them [13]. All writers have a set
of problems that are specific to them, i.e.,
their writing idiosyncrasies. Remembering
these problems is as important for an aca-
demic writer as remembering your friends’
birthdays. Create a list of these idiosyn-
crasies and run a search for these problems
using your word processor. If your problem
is demonstrative pronouns without summary
words, then search for “this/these/those” in
your text and check if you used the word ap-
propriately. If you have a problem with in-
tensifiers, then search for “really” or “very”
and delete them from the text. The same tar-
geted search can be done to eliminate wordi-
ness. Searching for “there is/are” or “and”
can help you avoid the bulky sentences.
The final strategy is working with a
hard copy and a pencil. Print a double space
copy with font size 14 and re-read your
paper in several steps. Try reading your
paper line by line with the rest of the text
covered with a piece of paper. When you are
forced to see only a small portion of your
writing, you are less likely to get distracted
and are more likely to notice problems. You
will end up spotting more unnecessary
words, wrongly worded phrases, or unparal-
lel constructions.
After you apply all these strategies, you
are ready to share your writing with your
friends, colleagues, and a writing advisor in
the writing center. Get as much feedback as
you can, especially from non-specialists in
your field. Patiently listen to what others say
to you ― you are not expected to defend
your writing or explain what you wanted to
say. You may decide what you want to
change and how after you receive the feed-
back and sort it in your head. Even though
some researchers make the revision an end-
189Kallestinova: Your first research paper