SNo Case No. Brief Subject Matter/Prayer
Petitioner/
Respondent
Department/
Subdepartment Next Date Status
Reply
Filed
lack of coordination between the respondents, which cannot be attributed to the petitioners and they cannot be
made to suffer for on fault to their. AND 5. Further for directing the respondents not to charge the enhanced
price from the petitioners in furtherance to the public notice after eleven years of launching of Scheme. 6. It is
also prayed that during the pendency of the present writ petition, charging of the enhanced price in furtherance
to the public notice ay kindly be stayed and no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners adversely
affecting their rights accrued pursuant to draw of lots held on 04.112010; 7. It is also prayed that the records of
the Housing Scheme 2008 may kindly be summoned and after fixing the responsibility of the erring
officials/officers, penal action be taking against them, in the light of order dated 23.02.2017 passed by the
Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court.
6
petition, there are total no. of 561 petitioners in the matter. Further, through this petition, they prayed that:- 1)
Issue of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to
complete the construction of the flats in terms of the Self Financing Housing Scheme 2008 on lease hold basis
for 99 years for employees of Chandigarh Administration floated on 14.01.2008 as per the rates prescribed in
the 2008 scheme; 2) Issue of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring that
the letter dated 05.10.2012 sent by the Govt. of India to the UT, Admn. is not binding upon the petitioners
and/or on the 2008 scheme since the land in question had already been allotted to the Chandigarh Housing
Board in the year 2008 and the aforesaid letter having been issued later in point of time cannot be held
applicable retrospectively on the land for which allotment had been made by the Chandigarh Administration to
the Chandigarh Housing Board in January 2008; 3) Issue of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the
nature of Certiorari quashing the public notice dated 22.06.2019 including the consent form and the public
notice dated 13.07.2019 whereby the Chandigarh Administration has issued a fresh letter of allotment for the
land at the rate of Rs.74131/- per square yard and is forcing the petitioner to submit the consent/willingness
form as per the rates mentioned in the impugned notice dated 22.06.2019 in an absolute illegal, arbitrary,
discriminatory, unjust, illogical manner and being without any valid basis and in violation of the principles of
natural justice and the well settled law as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and this Hon'ble
Court as detailed in the writ petition. 4) Issue any other appropriate writ, order of direction, which this Hon'ble
Court may deem fit and proper in the fact and circumstances of this case; They further prayed that the
respondents be restrained from taking any coercive action of from cancelling the allotment on account of non-
payment of the increased land cost during the pendency of the instant petition in the interests of justice, equity,
good conscience and fair play.
Abdul Namid &
Others / Union of
India & Others
Chandigarh Housing
Board/CHANDIGARH
HOUSING BOARD
14-Dec-2022 Adjourned
Yes / 30
Oct 2019
7
1. Writ petition filed by the Petitioner for directing the respondents to complete the construction of the flats in
terms of the Self Financing Housing Scheme 2008 on lease hold basis for 99 years for employees of
Chandigarh Administration (for short “2008 Schemeâ
€ ) floated on 14.01.2008 at the cost so prescribed in
the scheme; 2. Further for issuance of a writ for issue of order and direction for declaring that the letter dated
05.10.2012 sent by the Government of India to the U.T. Administration is not being on the petitioners and/or
the project since the land in question had already been allotted to the Housing Board in the year 2008 and the
aforesaid letter having been issued later in point of ;time cannot be held applicable retrospectively against the
land for which allotment had been made by the Administration to the Housing Board in January 2003/
AND/OR 3. Further for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to set aside the
order whereby the Chandigarh Administration has issued a fresh letter of allotment for the land at the rate of
Rs.74131/- per square yards being arbitrary and whimsical and being without any valid basis; AND/OR 4.
Further for directing setting aside the Public Notice dated 06.05.2019 whereby the respondent Board has
Gurmukh Singh &
956 others / Union of
India and others
Chandigarh Housing
Board/CHANDIGARH
HOUSING BOARD
14-Dec-2022 Adjourned
Yes / 01
Oct 2019