
20162017
Manatee
Dr.DianaGreene
AnthonyLosadaDirector,Secondary
Curriculum&ProfessionalLearning
9417516550x2064
InstructionalEvaluationSystem Template
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page1
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
TableofContents
1. PerformanceofStudents
2. InstructionalPractice
3. OtherIndicatorsofPerformance
4. SummativeEvaluationScore
5. AdditionalRequirements
6. DistrictEvaluationProcedures
7. DistrictSelfMonitoring
8. AppendixAChecklistforApproval
Directions:
ThisdocumenthasbeenprovidedinMicrosoftWordformatfortheconvenienceof
thedistrict.Theorderofthetemplateshallnotberearranged.Eachsectionoffers
specificdirections,butdoesnotlimittheamountofspaceorinformationthatcan
beaddedtofittheneedsofthedistrict.All
submitteddocumentsshallbetitledand
paginated.Wheredocumentationorevidenceisrequired,copiesofthesource
document(s)(forexample,rubrics,policiesandprocedures,observation
instruments)shallbeprovided.Uponcompletion,thedistrictshallemailthe
templateandrequiredsupportingdocumentationforsubmissiontotheaddress
**Modifications to an approved evaluation system may be made by the district at any
time. A revised evaluation system shall be submitted for approval, in accordance with
Rule 6A-5.030(3), F.A.C. The entire template shall be sent for the approval process.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page2
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
1. PerformanceofStudents
Directions:
Thedistrictshallprovide:
Forallinstructionalpersonnel,thepercentageoftheevaluationthatisbasedonthe
performanceofstudentscriterionasoutlinedins.1012.34(3)(a)1.,F.S.,alongwithan
explanationofthescoringmethod,includinghowitiscalculated andcombined[Rule
6A5.030(2)(a)1.,F.A.C.].
Atleast33.3%oftheevaluationisbasedonstudentlearninggrowthassessedannuallyby
statewideassessments.Forsubjectsnotmeasuredbystatewideassessments,thedistrict
will calculate student learning based on districtwide assessments developed by or
approvedbythedistrict.Thedistrictwillusethestateadoptedstudentgrowthmeasures
forcoursesassociatedwithFloridaStandards Assessmentsaswellasthosenotedonpage
4.
Teacher’sConfidenceIntervalUsingeachteacher’smeanstudentgrowth/performance
and standard deviation, the District will calculate99.9%, 99% and 50%Confidence
Intervalsforeachteacherbasedonhis/herassignedstudents.TheConfidenceIntervals
provide a level of confidence that the teacher’s classification is valid and reliable. The
teacher’s Confidence Intervals are defined as the teacher’s mean plus or minus the z
valuerepresentingthedesiredconfidencelevelmultipliedbytheresultoftheteacher’s
standarddeviationdividedbythesquarerootofthenumberofstudents.
Forclassroomteachersnewlyhiredbythedistrict,thestudentperformance
measureandscoringmethodforeachevaluation,includinghowitiscalculated
andcombined[Rule6A5.030(2)(a)2.,F.A.C.].
Atleast33.3%oftheevaluationisbasedonstudentlearninggrowthassessedannuallyby
statewideassessments.Forsubjectsnotmeasuredbystatewideassessments,thedistrict
will calculate student learning based on districtwide assessments developed by or
approvedbythedistrict.Thedistrictwillusethestateadoptedstudentgrowthmeasures
forcoursesassociatedwithFloridaStandardsAssessmentsaswellasthosenoted.
The district will
measure growth using equally appropriate formulas. The Florida
DepartmentofEducationwillprovidetheappropriatemodels.Thedistrictwillhavethe
option to request, through evaluation system review process, to use student
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page3
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
achievement, rather than growth, or combination of growth and achievement for
classroomteacherswhereachievementismoreappropriate.
Forallinstructionalpersonnel,confirmationofincludingstudentperformancedata
foratleastthreeyears,includingthecurrentyearandthetwoyearsimmediately
precedingthecurrentyear, whenavailable.Iflessthanthethreemostrecentyearsof
dataareavailable,thoseyearsforwhichdataareavailablemustbeused.Ifmore
thanthreeyearsofstudentperformancedataareused,specifytheyearsthatwillbe
used[Rule6A5.030(2)(a)3.,F.A.C.].
Thestatemodelisacorethreelevelcovariatemodelthatincludesacalculationof
theuniqueteachereffectplusonehalfoftheoverallschooleffect.Theteacher
effectisthedifferencebetweenthepredictedperformanceand actualperformance
ofthestudentsconnectedwiththeteacherforeachFSAreadingandmathtest.The
predictedperformanceisbasedontheprevio ustwoyearsofFSAperformancebythe
studentwhiletakingintoconsiderationtheadditionalstateapprovedvariables.
Iflessthanthreeyearsofdataareavailable,yearsforwhichdataareavailablemustbe
used.Thedistrictwillincludestudentlearninggrowthdataandothermeasurablestudent
outcomes, as they are approved at the state or local level. If three years of student
learninggrowthdataarenotavailable,yearsavailablemustbeused.
Forclassroomteachersofstudentsforcoursesassessedbystatewide,standardized
assessmentsunders.1008.22,F.S.,documentationthatVAMresultscompriseat
leastonethirdoftheevaluation[Rule6A5.030(2)(a)4.,F.A.C.].
Forclassroomteachersofstudentsforcoursesnotassessedbystatewide,
standardizedassessments,thedistrictdeterminedstudentperformancemeasure(s)
[Rule6A5.030(2)(a)5.,F.A.C.]
Forinstructionalpersonnelwhoarenotclassroomteachers,thedistrictdetermined
studentperformancemeasure(s)
[Rule6A5.030(2)(a)6.,F.A.C.].
Thefollowingoptionalchartisprovidedforyourconvenience.Otherwaystodisplay
informationareacceptable.Thischartisintendedtoaddresssomeofthebulletslisted
above,butadditionaldocumentationmaybeneeded.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page4
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
StudentPerformanceMeasures
StudentPerformanceMeasure:
Allinstructionalpersonnelwillincludestudentperformancedataforatleastthreeyears,
includingthecurrentyearandthetwoyearsimmediatelyprecedingthecurrentyear,when
available.Iflessthanthethreemostrecentyearsofdataareavailable,thoseyearsforwhich
dataareavailablemustbeused.
GradeLevelorSubject
AreaofTeacher
PerformanceMeasure(s)for
EvaluationPurposes
PercentageAssociated
withFinalSummative
Evaluation
PreKindergarten(PK) N/A N/A
Kindergarten(K) IReady 33.3%
FirstGrade(1) IReady 33.3%
SecondGrade(2) IReady 33.3%
ThirdGrade(3) IReadytoFSA 33.3%
FourthGrade(4) FSAVAM 33.3%
FifthGrade(5) FSAVAMandFCATScience 33.3%
Other(K5),includingnon
classroominstructional
personnel
SchoolVAM
33.3%
MathCourses(68) FSAVAM 33.3%
ScienceCourses(8) FCATScience 33.3%
English/Language
Arts/ReadingCourses(6
8)
FSAVAM
33.3%
Other(68),includingnon
classroominstructional
personnel
FSA
33.3%
Civics StateEOC 33.3%
English1&2 FSAVAM 33.3%
English3&4 ACT/SATReading 33.3%
Algebra1;Algebra1
Honors;Algebra1B
StateEOCVAM
33.3%
Geometry;Geometry
Honors
StateEOC
33.3%
AdvancedPlacement NationalPassRate
33.3%
International
Baccalaureate
InternationalPassRate
33.33%
CambridgeAICE InternationalPassRate
33.33%
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page5
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Biology1;Biology1
Honors;Biology
Technology;Biology1Pre
IB;IntegratedScience3;
IntegratedScience3
Honors
StateEOC
33.33%
UnitedStatesHistory StateEOC 33.33%
All912classroom
instructionalpersonnel
ACT/SAT
33.33%
Other(912),including
nonclassroom
instructionalpersonnel
SchoolVAM 33.33%
DistrictNonClassroom
InstructionalPersonnel
DistrictVAM 33.33%
ESEInstructional
personnel
FSAA 33.33%
ManateeCountywillacceptthestatedeterminedVAMscoreofeachteacher.Thisscore
willbea14score,indicatedbyUtoHE.Thechartbelowdemonstrateshowthisscore
willbeconvertedtopointsforthesummativeevaluationscore:
VAMScoreConversion CategoricalScore =Points
4 HighlyEffective 4
3 Effective 3
2
Needs
Improvement/Developing
2
1 Unsatisfactory 1
NonVAMScoreConversion
(thiswillbeusedfor
assessmentsthatdon’thave
aconversionchartlisted
withinthedocument)
CategoricalScore =Points
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page6
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Entire50%confidence
intervalisgreaterthanthe
districtaverage
HighlyEffective 4
Allteacherswhose
confidenceintervalsdon’t
meettheclassificationsfor
theothercategories
Effective 3
Entire99%confidence
intervalislessthanthe
districtaverageandsome
portionofthe99.9%
confidenceintervalisgreater
thanthedistrictaverage
Needs
Improvement/Developing
2
Entire99.9%confidence
intervalislessthanthe
districtaverage
Unsatisfactory 1
ManateeCountywillallowthesitebasedprincipaltodeterminethestudentperformance
measureforthenewlyhiredforthefirstevaluationandusenonVAMcalculationforscoring.

SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page7
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
2. InstructionalPractice
Directions:
Thedistrictshallprovide:
Forallinstructionalpersonnel,thepercentageoftheevaluationthatisbasedonthe
instructionalpracticecriterionasoutlinedins.1012.34(3)(a)2.,F.S.,alongwithan
explanationofthescoringmethod,includinghowitiscalculated andcombined[Rule
6A5.030(2)(b)1.,F.A.C.].
50%TeacherOnsiteEvaluationData(InstructionalPracticeScore)whichisbrokendown
byfourdomainareasusingtheDanielsonFrameworkforTeachingrubrics
a) 20%‐PlanningandPreparation
b) 30%‐ClassroomEnvironment
c) 30%‐Instruction
d) 20%‐ProfessionalResponsibilities
Unsatisfactory
NeedsImprovement/
Developing
Effective
HighlyEffective
1.001.49 1.502.49 2.503.49 3.504.00
Descriptionofthedistrictevaluationframeworkforinstructionalpersonnelandthe
contemporaryresearchbasisineffectiveeducationalpractices[Rule6A5.030(2)(b)2.,
F.A.C.].
TheEducatorAccomplishedPracticesaresetforthinruleasFlorida’scorestandards
foreffectiveeducators.TheAccomplishedPracticesformthefoundationforthestate’s
teacherpreparationprograms,educatorcertificationrequirementsandschooldistrict
instructionalpersonnelappraisalsystems.
TheAccomplishedPracticesarebaseduponandfurtherdescribethreeessentialprinciples:
Theeffectiveeducatorcreatesacultureofhighexpectationsforallstudentsby
promotingtheimportanceofeducationandeachstudent’scapacityforacademic
achievement.
Theeffectiveeducatordemonstratesdeepandcomprehensiveknowledgeofthe
subjecttaught.
Theeffectiveeducatorexemplifiesthestandardsoftheprofession.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page8
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
TeachersareevaluatedusingtheDanielsonFrameworkforTeaching(Danielson,2007)rubrics
alignedwitheachelementwithinthecomponentsforeachdomain.Evaluatorsprovide
evidencedocumentingteacherperformancewithinthecomponents.
Forallinstructionalpersonnel,acrosswalkfromthedistrict'sevaluationframework
totheEducatorAccomplishedPracticesdemonstratingthatthedistrict’s evaluation
systemcontainsindicatorsbaseduponeachoftheEducatorAccomplishedPractices
[Rule6A5.030(2)(b)3.,F.A.C.].
TheFEAPalignmentchartcanbefoundatthefollowinglink:
http://www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/7503/urlt/0071814tesafeaps
marzanodanielson.pdf
Forclassroomteachers,observationinstrument(s)thatincludeindicatorsbasedon
eachoftheEducatorAccomplishedPractices[Rule6A5.030(2)(b)4.,F.A.C.].
TeachersareevaluatedusingtheDanielsonFrameworkforTeaching(Danielson,2007)
rubricsalignedwitheachelementwithinthecomponentsforeachdomain.Evaluators
provideevidencedocumentingteacherperformancewithinthecomponents.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page9
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
ObservationInstrument:
Fornonclassroominstructionalpersonnel,evaluationinstrument(s)thatinclude
indicatorsbasedoneachoftheEducatorAccomplishedPractices[Rule6A
5.030(2)(b)5.,F.A.C.].
Nonclassroominstructionalpersonnelareevaluatedusingthenonclassroomteacher
DanielsonFrameworkforTeaching(Danielson,2007)rubricsalignedwitheachelement
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page10
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
withinthecomponentsforeachdomain.Evaluatorsprovideevidencedocumenting
teacherperformancewithinthecomponents.
ObservationInstrumentfornonclassroompersonnel(rubricsreflectthepositiontype:
Forallinstruct ionalpersonnel,proceduresforconductingobservationsand
collectingdataandotherevidenceofinstructionalpractice[Rule6A5.030(2)(b)6.,
F.A.C.].
TheDanielsonFrameworkforTeachingisthefoundationoftheManateeCounty Teacher
EvaluationSystem.Asstatedinthephilosophy,the purposeofthesystemistoimprove
the quality of instructional,administrative,andsupervisoryservice to increase student
learninggrowth.Eachteacherwillbeobservedatleastonce
duringtheyearwithnew
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page11
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
teachers,probationaryteachers,andteachersnewtothedistrictbeingobservedatleast
twiceduringtheyear.
An Initial Screening visit will be conducted by the evaluator within the first thirty (30)
instructionaldayseachyearorwithinthefirst30daysofinitialemploymentforteachers
newtothedistrictandanyteacherreceivingalessthaneffectiveratinginStandard 1,2,
3or4ontheprioryear’sevaluationusingtheIniti alScreeningsectionof“MyProfessional
GrowthPlan”platform.Datacollectedduringtheinitialscreeningshallbesharedwiththe
teacherassoonaspracticalforfeedbackanddiscussion,butnomorethanten(10)days
fromtheinitialscreeningvisit.
Formal observations for evaluation purposes shall be performed using the Danielson
Frameworkfor Teachingrubrics andrequire priornotice totheteacher.Datacollected
duringformalorinformalobservationsthataretobeusedforevaluationpurposesshall
be shared with the teachers in a written form through “My Professional Growth Plan”
platformwithinten(10)daysoftheobservation.
InformalobservationsandbriefWalkthroughobservationsbyanadministratormaybe
conductedatanytime.Walksmaybescheduledorunscheduledvisitstotheclassroom.
Datacollected ontheWalkthroughforms orbyinformalobservations maybeused to
supportdemonstrationofhighlyeffectivebehavior,effectivebehavior,orhighlightareas
for further development. Data will be shared with the teacher as soon as practical for
feedbackanddiscussion,butnomorethanten(10)daysfromtheWalkthrough.
Trained observers may conduct Walkthrough observations, brief seven to ten minute
observations, and collect data using the Danielson Framework for Teaching rubrics
focusingonDomain2TheClassroomEnvironmentandDomain3Instruction.Alldata
collected for evaluation purposes will be documented through the “My Professional
Growth Plan” platform and must be accessible for teacher feedback and
acknowledgement through the platform.A conference must be held for any Walk
throughwhenimprovementsarenotedthatcouldnegativelyimpacttheevaluationor
attherequestoftheteacheroradministrator.Walksinwhichnodatawillbeusedinthe
evaluationprocessdonotrequireaconferenceorthemaintenanceofaform.However,
feedbackisalwaysencouraged.
Teacherstobeevaluatedandadministratorsresponsibleforevaluatingteachersmustbe
trainedpriortoanyinitialscreening,observations,walkthroughsorany
evaluationofa
teacher’s performance.Training will be provided by the designated Manatee County
TeacherEvaluationCommitteemembers.Eachyearevaluatorswillbeprovidedareview
oftheevaluationsystem as wellasupdates onanymodificationsmade to thesystem.
New evaluatorswill receive trainingbymembersoftheevaluationcommittee prior to
observingteachers.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page12
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
TEACHEREVALUATIONOBSERVATIONPROCEDURES
OVERVIEW
TheDanielsonFrameworkforTeachingisthefoundationoftheManateeCounty Teacher
Evaluation System.As stated in the philosophy, the purpose of the system is to improve the
quality of instructional, administrative, and supervisory service to increase student learning
growth.Each teacher will be observed at least once during the
year with new teachers,
probationaryteachers,andteachersnewtothedistrictbeingobservedatleasttwiceduringthe
year.
An Initial Screening visit will be conducted by the evaluator within the first thirty (30)
instructionaldayseachyearorwithinthefirst30daysofinitial employmentforteachersnewto
thedistrictandanyteacherreceivingalessthaneffectiveratinginStandard1,2,3or4onthe
prior year’s evaluation using the Initial Screening section of “My Professional Growth Plan”
platform.Datacollectedduringtheinitialscreeningshallbesharedwiththeteacherassoonas
practicalforfeedbackanddiscussion,butnomorethanten(10)daysfromtheinitialscreening
visit.
Formal observations for evaluation purposes shall be performed using the Danielson
FrameworkforTeaching rubricsandrequire priornoticeto theteacher.Data collectedduring
formalorinformalobservationsthataretobeusedforevaluationpurposesshallbesharedwith
theteachersinawrittenformthrough“My ProfessionalGrowthPlan”platformwithinten(10)
daysoftheobservation.
InformalobservationsandbriefWalkthroughobservationsbyanadministratormaybe
conductedatanytime.Walksmay bescheduledorunscheduledvisitstotheclassroom.Data
collected on the Walkthrough forms or by informal observations may be used to support
demonstration of highly effective behavior, effective behavior, or highlight areas for further
development. Data will be shared with the teacher as soon as practical for feedback and
discussion,butnomorethan
ten(10)daysfromtheWalkthrough.
Trained observers may conduct Walkthrough observations, brief seven to ten minute
observations,andcollectdatausingtheDanielsonFrameworkforTeachingrubricsfocusingon
Domain 2 The Classroom Environment and Domain 3 Instruction. All data collected for
evaluationpurposeswill
bedocumentedthroughthe “MyProfessionalGrowthPlan”platform
and must be accessible for teacher feedback and acknowledgement through the platform.A
conference must be held for any Walkthrough when improvements are noted that could
negativelyimpact theevaluationor attherequestof theteacheror administrator. Walksin
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page13
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
which no data will be used in the evaluation process do not require a conference or the
maintenanceofaform.However,feedbackisalwaysencouraged.
Teacherstobeevaluatedandadministratorsresponsibleforevaluatingteachersmustbe
trainedpriortoanyinitialscreening,observations,walkthroughsoranyevaluation
ofateacher’s
performance.TrainingwillbeprovidedbythedesignatedManateeCountyTeacherEvaluation
Committeemembers.Eachyearevaluatorswillbeprovidedareviewoftheevaluationsystemas
wellasupdatesonanymodificationsmadetothesystem.Newevaluatorswillreceivetraining
bymembersoftheevaluationcommitteepriortoobservingteachers.
PREOBSERVATIONCONFERENCE
Thepreobservationtoolcontainedwithinthe “MyProfessionalGrowthPlan”platform
may be used as evidence to demonstrate effective practices in Domains 1 and 4. The pre
observationconferencewill beusedtosupportthe expectationsforDomain1 Planningand
Preparation and Domain 4 Professional Responsibilities.Domain 1 pertains to the specific
observedlessonandDomain4pertainstoyearlyteachingpractice.Theteachercompletesthis
formwithinthe“My ProfessionalGrowthPlan”platformpriortotheconference.Thisformmay
be modified as a result of the preobservation conference. Examples of documentation for
meetingthese standardsmay includeaGradebookpage,studentportfolios,data files,lesson
plans,sampleassessments,teachermadetests,quizzes,exittickets,entrancetickets,etc.
OBSERVATIONPROCESS
“MyProfessionalGrowthPlan”platformwillbeusedtogatherevidencetosupportthe
expectations for Domain 2 The Classroom Environment and Domain 3 Instruction. The
observershouldarrivepriortothebeginningofthelessonandstayforatleast30minutes.Data
orbehaviorsrelatedtoeachoftheexpectationsshouldbenotedwithintheplatform.
FEEDBACKANDCONFERENCES
A postobservation conference must be held and documented after each formal
observationusingthePostObservationConferenceForm.Observationnotesshouldbeshared
with the teacher through the “My Professional Growth Plan” platform prior to the post
observationconferencetofacilitateteacherself‐evaluation.Inaddition,a conferencemustbe
held for any Initial Screening or Walkthrough when improvements are noted that could
negativelyimpacttheevaluationorattherequestoftheteacheroradministrator.Conferences
shouldcovertheanalysisofdatacollectedfrombothparties,theidentificationofstrengthsand
weaknesses (if any) and plans for improvement
assistance or followup as needed. No data
should be given to a teacher without the opportunity for feedback and discussion with the
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page14
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
administrator or supervisor. All initial documentation used for evaluation decisions must be
included on the “My Professional Growth Plan” platform. A written follow up of a "problem
centered"conferenceshallbedocumentedwithinthe“MyProfessionalGrowthPlan”platform
andaccessibletotheteacherwithin ten(10)workingdaysoftheconference.Theemployeemay
provide a written response to any screening, observation, walkthrough, evaluation or
conferencewhichshalluploadedtothe“MyProfessionalGrowthPlan”platformandincludedin
theindividual'spersonnelfile.
Should necessary improvements become apparent during the observation, said
improvementsshallbediscussedwiththeemployeeandnotedwithin“MyProfessionalGrowth
Plan”platformtogetherwith:
a. specificimprovement(s)desired,
b. timeforimprovement(s)tobemade,
c. assistancetobeprovided,ifnecessary.
CONTINUOUSIMPROVEMENT
The Principal or designee shall meet with all teachers at the beginning of the year to
reviewtheevaluationandobservationprocessandtodiscusstheProfessionalDevelopmentPlan
(PDP)andtojointlyestablishdeliberatepracticeimprovementgoalsfortheyear.Forteachers
newtothedistricttheprincipalshallmeetwith the teachertofinalizethePDP,following the
initialscreeningorfirstobservation.
StandardsandIndicators
DOMAIN1:PlanningandPreparation
Effectiveeducatorsorganizeinstructionintoasequenceofactivitiesandexercisesnecessaryto
makelearningaccessibleforallstudents.ComponentsofDomain1include:
DemonstratingKnowledgeofContentandPedagogy
o KnowledgeofContentandtheStructureoftheDiscipline
o KnowledgeofPrerequisiteRelationships
o KnowledgeofContentRelatedPedagogy
DemonstratingKnowledgeofStudents
o KnowledgeofChildandAdolescentDevelopment
o KnowledgeoftheLearningProcess
o KnowledgeofStudents’Skills,Knowledge,andLanguageProficiency
o KnowledgeofStudents’InterestsandCulturalHeritage
o KnowledgeofStudents’SpecialNeeds
SelectingInstructionalOutcomes
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page15
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
o Value,Sequence,andAlignment
o Clarity
o Balance
o SuitabilityforDiverseLearners
DemonstratingKnowledgeofResources
o ResourcesforClassroomUse
o ResourcestoExtendContentKnowledgeandPedagogy
o ResourcesforStudents
DesigningCoherentInstruction
o LearningActivities
o InstructionalMaterialsandResources
o InstructionalGroups
o Lesson andUnitStructure
DesigningStudentAssessment
o CongruencewithInstructionalOutcomes
o CriteriaandStandards
o Design ofFormativeAssessments
o UseinFuturePlanning
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page16
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN1:PLANNINGAND
PREPARATION
Component1b:
DemonstratingKnowledgeof
Students
Theteacher
displays
understandingof
individualstudents,
recognizesthe
valueof
understanding
theircultural
heritage,collects
informationfroma
varietyofsources
andpossesses
informationabout
Theteacher
recognizesthe
valueof
understanding
students
includingtheir
culturalheritage
asdisplayedfor
groupsof
studentsand
showsawareness
oftheirspecial
The teacher recognizes
the value of
understanding students
including the importance
of knowing students’
special learning or
medical needs but
displays that knowledge
for the class as a whole
or in an incomplete or
inaccurate manner.
Theteacherdisplays
littleorno
knowledgeof
studentsincluding
informationrelated
totheircultural
heritageor
understandingof
speciallearningor
medicalneeds.
DOMAIN1:PLANNINGANDPREPARATION
Component1aDemonstratingKnowledgeofContentandPedagogy
Teacherdisplays
extensive
knowledgeofthe
importantconcepts
andprerequisite
relationshipsinthe
disciplineandhow
theserelatebothto
oneanotherandto
otherdisciplines.
Teacher’splansand
practicereflect
familiaritywitha
widerangeof
effective
pedagogical
approachesinthe
discipline,
anticipatingstudent
misconceptions.
Thelesson’sor
unit’sstructureis
clearandallowsfor
differentpathways
accordingtodiverse
studentneeds.The
progressionof
activitiesishighly
coherent.
Teacherdisplays
solidknowledge
oftheimportant
conceptsandpre
requisite
relationshipsin
thedisciplineand
howtheserelate
tooneanother.
Teacher’splans
andpractice
reflectfamiliarity
withawiderange
ofeffective
pedagogical
approachesinthe
discipline.
Thelessonorunit
hasaclearly
definedstructure
aroundwhich
activitiesare
organized.
Progressionof
activitiesiseven,
withreasonable
timeallocations.
Teacherisfamiliarwith
theimportantconcepts
andsomeprerequisite
relationshipsinthe
disciplinebut
may
displaylackof
awarenessofhow
theseconceptsrelate
tooneanother.
Teacher’splansand
practicereflecta
limitedrangeof
pedagogical
approachesorsome
approachesthatare
notsuitabletothe
disciplineortothe
students.
Thelessonorunithasa
recognizablestructure,
althoughthe
structure
isnotuniformly
maintainedthroughout.
Progressionofactivities
isuneven,withmost
timeallocations
reasonable.
Inplanningand
practice,teacher
makescontent
errors,displayslittle
understandingof
prerequisite
relationshipsordoes
notcorrecterrors
madebystudents.
Teacherdisplays
littleorno
understandingofthe
rangeof
pedagogical
approachessuitable
tostudentlearning
ofthecontent.
Thelessonorunit
hasnoclearly
definedstructure,or
thestructureis
chaotic.Activitiesdo
notfollowan
organized
progression,and
timeallocationsare
unrealistic.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page17
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
eachstudent’s
learningand
medicalneeds.
Learningactivities
arehighlysuitable
todiverselearners
andsupportthe
instructional
outcomes.Theyare
alldesignedto
engagestudentsin
highlevelcognitive
activityandare
differentiated,as
appropriate,for
individuallearners.
Instructional
groupsarevaried
asappropriateto
thestudentsand
thedifferent
instructional
outcomes.Thereis
evidenceof
studentchoicein
selectingthe
differentpatterns
ofinstructional
groups.
learningand
medicalneeds.
Allofthelearning
activitiesare
suitableto
studentsortothe
instructional
outcomes,and
mostrepresent
significant
cognitive
challenge,with
some
differentiationfor
differentgroups
of
students.
Instructional
groupsarevaried
asappropriateto
thestudentsand
thedifferent
instructional
outcomes.
Onlysomeofthe
learningactivitiesare
suitabletostudentsor
totheinstructional
outcomes.Some
representamoderate
cognitivechallenge,but
withnodifferentiation
fordifferentstudents.
Instructionalgroups
partiallysupport
the
instructionaloutcomes,
withaneffortatpro
vidingsomevariety.
Learningactivities
arenotsuitableto
studentsorto
instructional
outcomesandare
notdesignedto
engagestudentsin
activeintellectual
activity.
Instructional groups
do not support the
instructional
outcomes and offer
no variety.

SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page18
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN1:PLANNINGANDPREPARATION
Component1c:AssessmentsandOutcomes
Proposedapproach
toassessmentis
fullyalignedwith
instructional
outcomeswhich
representhigh
expectationsand
rigorinboth
contentand
processandare
connectedtoa
sequenceof
learningwithinthe
disciplineand
relateddisciplines.
Assessment
methodologies
havebeenadapted
forindividual
students,as
needed.
Alltheoutcomes
areclear,
written
intheformof
studentlearning,
andpermitviable
methodsof
assessment.
Where
appropriate,
outcomesreflect
severaldifferent
typesoflearning
andopportunities
forboth
coordinationand
integration.
Outcomesare
basedona
comprehensive
assessmentof
studentlearning
Allthe
instructional
outcomesare
assessedthrough
theapproach
to
assessment;
however,most
outcomes
representhigh
expectationsand
rigorand
importantlearning
inthediscipline.
Theyare
connectedtoa
sequenceof
learning.
Assessment
methodologies
mayhavebeen
adaptedfor
groupsof
students.

Allthe
instructional
outcomesare
clear,writtenin
theformof
studentlearning.
Mostsuggest
viablemethodsof
assessment.

Outcomesreflect
severaldifferent
typesoflearning
andopportunities
forcoordination.
Mostofthe
outcomesare
suitableforall
studentsinthe
classandare
Someofthe
instructional
outcomes
areassessedthrough
theproposedapproach,
andrepresent
moderatelyhigh
expectationsandrigor
reflectingimportant
learninginthediscipline
andatleastsome
connectiontoa
sequenceoflearning.
Outcomesareonly
moderatelyclearor
consistofacombination
ofoutcomesand
activities.Some
outcomesdo
notpermit
viablemethodsof
assessment.
Outcomesreflect
severaltypesof
learning,butteacher
hasmadenoattemptat
coordinationor
integration.
Mostoftheoutcomes
aresuitableformostof
thestudentsintheclass
basedonglobal
assessmentsofstudent
learning.
Assessment
proceduresarenot
congruentwith
instructional
outcomes,represent
lowexpectationsfor
students,lackof
rigoranddonot
reflectimportant
learninginthe
disciplineora
connectiontoa
sequenceoflearning.
Outcomesareeither
notclearorare
statedasactivities
notasstudent
learning.Outcomes
donotpermit
viable
methodsof
assessment.
Outcomesreflect
onlyonetypeof
learningandonly
onedisciplineor
strand.
Outcomesarenot
suitablefortheclass
orarenotbasedon
anyassessmentof
studentneeds.

SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page19
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
andtakeinto
accountthe
varyingneedsof
individualstudents
orgroups.
Assessment criteria
and standards are
clear, assessed
through formative
assessments
designed with
evidence of student
participation and
results are used to
plan for future
instruction for
individual students.
basedonevidence
ofstudent
proficiency.
However,the
needsofsome
individual
studentsmaynot
be
accommodated.
Assessment
criteriaand
standardsare
clear,assessed
throughformative
assessmentsand
resultsareused
by
theteacherto
planforfuture
instructionfor
groupsof
students.
Assessmentcriteriaand
standardsareunclear,
assessedthrough
rudimentaryformative
assessmentsand
teacherusesresultsto
planforfuture
instructionfortheclass
asawhole.
Proposed approach
contains no criteria
or standards. The
teacher has no plan to
incorporate formative
assessment or to use
assessment results in
designing future
instruction.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page20
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN1:PLANNINGANDPREPARATION
Component1d:UseandUnderstandingofResources
Teacher’s
knowledgeof
resourcesfor
classroomuseas
wellastoenhance
contentand
pedagogical
knowledgeis
extensive,
includingthose
availablethrough
theschoolor
district,inthe
community,
through
professional
organizationsand
universities,andon
theInternet.
Allofthematerials
andresourcesare
suitableto
students,support
the
instructional
outcomes,andare
designedtoengage
studentsin
meaningful
learning.Thereis
evidenceof
appropriateuseof
technologyandof
student
participationin
selectingor
adaptingmaterials.
Teacherdisplays
awarenessof
resources
availablefor
classroomuseas
wellasto
enhancecontent
andpedagogical
knowledge
throughthe
schoolordistrict
andsome
familiaritywith
resources
externaltothe
schoolandonthe
Internet.
Allofthe
materialsand
resourcesare
suitableto
students,support
theinstructional
outcomes,and
aredesignedto
engagestudents
inmeaningful
learning.

Teacherdisplays
awarenessofresources
availableforclassroom
useaswellas
to
enhancecontentand
pedagogicalknowledge
andforstudents
throughtheschoolor
districtbutdisplaysno
knowledgeofresources
availablemorebroadly.
Someofthematerials
andresourcesare
suitabletostudents,
supportthe
instructionaloutcomes,
andengagestudentsin
meaningfullearning.
Teacherisunaware
of
resourcesfor
classroomuseas
wellastoenhance
contentand
pedagogical
knowledgeandfor
studentsavailable
throughtheschool
ordistrict.
Materialsand
resourcesarenot
suitableforstudents
anddonotsupport
theinstructional
outcomesorengage
studentsin
meaningfullearning.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page21
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
DOMAIN2:TheClassroomEnvironment
Effectiveeducatorsestablishproceduresandtransitiontoensurestudentsareengagedin
activelearningactivities.ComponentsofDomain2include:
CreatinganEnvironmentofRespectandRapport
o TeacherInteractionwithStudents
o Student InteractionswithOneAnother
EstablishingaCultureforLearning
o ImportanceoftheContent
o ExpectationsforLearningandAchievement
o Student Pride inWork
ManagingClassroomProcedures
o ManagementofInstructionalGroups
o ManagementofTransitions
o ManagementofMaterialsandSupplies
o Performance ofNonInstructionalDuties
o SupervisionofVolunteersandParaprofessionals
ManagingStudentBehavior
o Expectations
o Monitoring ofStudentBehavior
o ResponsetoStudentMisbehavior
OrganizingPhysicalSpace
o Safety andAccessibility
ArrangementofFurnitureandUseofPhysicalResources.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page22
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
DOMAIN2
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN2:THECLASSROOMENVIRONMENT
Component2a:CreatinganEnvironmentofRespect
andRapport
Teacherinteractions
withstudentsreflect
genuinerespectand
caringforindividuals
aswellasgroupsof
students.
Students
demonstrategenuine
caringforone
anotherandmonitor
oneanother’s
treatmentofpeers,
correctingclassmates
respectfullywhen
needed.Students
contributeto
explainingconcepts
totheirpeers.
Teacherstudent
interactionsare
friendly
and
demonstrate
generalcaring
andrespect.
Studentsexhibit
respectforthe
teacher,and
student
interactionsare
generallypolite
andrespectful.
Teacherstudent
interactionsare
generallyappropriate
butmayreflect
occasional
inconsistencies,
favoritism,ordisregard
forstudents’cultures.
Studentsexhibitonly
minimalrespectforthe
teacherandeach
other.
Teacherinteraction
withatleastsome
studentsisnegative,
demeaning,
sarcastic,or
inappropriatetothe
ageorcultureofthe
students.
Studentinteractions
arecharacterizedby
conflict,sarcasm,or
putdowns.
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN2:THECLASSROOM
ENVIRONMENT
Component2b:EstablishingaCulturefor
Learning
Instructional
outcomes,activities
andassignments,
andclassroom
interactionsconvey
highexpectationsfor
allstudents.As
evidencedbytheir
activeparticipation,
curiosity,initiative
andprideintheir
work,studentshave
internalizedthese
expectations.
Instructional
outcomes,
activitiesand
assignments,and
classroom
interactions
conveyhigh
expectationsfor
moststudents.
Instructionaloutcomes,
activitiesand
assignments,and
classroominteractions
conveyonlymodest
expectationsforstudent
learningand
achievement.
Instructional
outcomes,activities
andassignments,
andclassroom
interactionsconvey
lowexpectationsfor
atleastsome
students.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page23
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN2:THECLASSROOMENVIRONMENT
Component2c:ManagingClassroomProcedures
Smallgroupworkis
wellorganized,and
studentsare
productively
engagedatalltimes,
withstudents
assuming
responsibilityfor
productivity.
Transitionsand
routinesforhandling
materialsand
suppliesare
seamless,with
studentsassuming
someresponsibility
forsmoothand
efficientoperation.
Systemsfor
performingnon
instructionalduties
arewellestablished,
withstudents
assuming
considerable
responsibilityfor
efficientoperation.
Smallgroupwork
iswellorganized,
andmost
studentsare
productively
engagedin
learningwhile
unsupervisedby
theteacher.
Transitionsand
routinesfor
handlingmaterials
andsupplies
occursmoothly,
withlittlelossof
instructionaltime.
Efficientsystems
forperforming
noninstructional
duties
arein
place,resultingin
minimallossof
instructionaltime.
Studentsinonlysome
groupsareproductively
engagedinlearning
whileunsupervisedby
theteacher.
Onlysometransitions
areefficientand
routinesforhandling
materialsandsupplies
functionmoderately
well,butwithsomeloss
ofinstructionaltime.
Systemsfor
performing
noninstructionalduties
areonlyfairlyefficient,
resultinginsomelossof
instructionaltime.
Studentsnotworking
withtheteacherare
notproductively
engagedinlearning.
Transitionsare
chaoticandmaterials
andsuppliesare
handledinefficiently,
resultingin
significantlossof
instructionaltime.
Considerable
instructionaltimeis
lostinperforming
noninstructional
duties.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page24
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN2:THECLASSROOMENVIRONMENT
Component2d:ManagingStudentBehavior
Standardsof
conductareclearto
allstudentsand
appeartohavebeen
developedwith
student
participation.
Monitoringby
teacherissubtleand
preventive.
Teacherresponseto
misbehavioris
highlyeffectiveand
sensitiveto
students’individual
needs,orstudent
behaviorisentirely
appropriate.
Standardsof
conductare
clear
toallstudents.
Teacherisalertto
studentbehavior
atalltimes.
Teacherresponse
tomisbehavioris
appropriateand
successfuland
respectsthe
student’sdignity,
orstudent
behavioris
generally
appropriate.
Standardsofconduct
appeartohavebeen
established,andmost
studentsseemto
understand
them.
Teacherisgenerally
awareofstudent
behaviorbutmaymiss
theactivitiesofsome
students.
Teacherattemptsto
respondtostudent
misbehaviororthe
responseisinconsistent
butwithunevenresults,
ortherearenomajor
infractionsoftherules.
Nostandardsof
conductappearto
have
been
established,or
studentsare
confusedastowhat
thestandardsare.
Studentbehavioris
notmonitored,and
teacherisunaware
ofwhatthestudents
aredoing.

Teacherdoesnot
respondto
misbehavior,is
overlyrepressiveor
doesnotrespectthe
student’sdignity.
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN2:THECLASSROOM
ENVIRONMENT
Component2e:OrganizingPhysical
Space
Theclassroomis
safe,andstudents
themselvesensure
thatalllearningis
equallyaccessibleto
allstudents.
Theclassroomis
safe,andlearning
isequally
accessibletoall
students.
Theclassroomissafe,
andatleastessential
learningisaccessibleto
moststudents.
Theclassroomis
unsafe,
orlearningis
notaccessibleto
somestudents.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page25
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
DOMAIN3:Instruction
Effectiveeducatorsengagestudentsinlearning.ComponentsofDomain3include:
ReflectingonTeaching
o Accuracy
o UseinFutureTeaching
MaintainingAccurateRecords
o Student CompletionofAssignments
o Student ProgressinLearning
o NoninstructionalRecords
CommunicatingwithFamilies
o Information abouttheInstructionalProgram
o Information aboutIndividualStudents
o EngagementofFamiliesintheInstructional Program
ParticipatinginaProfessionalCommunity
o RelationshipswithColleagues
o InvolvementinaCultureofProfessi onalInquiry
o ServicetotheSchool
o ParticipationinSchoolandDistrictProjects
GrowingandDevelopingProfessionally
o Enhancement ofContentKnowledgeandPedagogicalSkill
o Receptivity toFeedbackfromColleagues
o ServicetotheProfession
DemonstratingProfessionalism
o Integrity andEthicalConduct
o ServicetoStudents
o Advocacy
o DecisionMaking
o CompliancewithSchoolandDistrictRegulations
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page26
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
DOMAIN3
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLYEFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN3:INSTRUCTION
Component3a:CommunicationwithStudents
Teachermakesthe
purposeofthelesson
orunitclear,
includingwhereitis
situatedwithin
broaderlearning,
linkingthatpurpose
tostudentinterests.
Teacher’sdirections
andproceduresare
cleartostudentsand
anticipatepossible
student
misunderstanding.
Teacherfinds
opportunitiesto
extendstudents’
vocabularies.
Teacher’s
purposeforthe
lessonor
unitis
clear.
Teacher’s
directionsand
proceduresare
clearto
students.
Vocabularyis
appropriateto
thestudents’
agesand
interests.
Teacherattemptsto
explaintheinstructional
purpose,withlimited
success.
Teacher’sdirectionsand
proceduresareclarified
afterinitialstudent
confusion.
Vocabularyiscorrect
butlimitedorisnot
appropriatetothe
students’agesor
backgrounds.
Teacher’spurposein
alessonorunitis
uncleartostudents.
Teacher’sdirections
andproceduresare
confusingto
students.

Vocabularymaybe
inappropriate,vague,
orusedincorrectly,
leavingstudents
confused.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page27
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN3:INSTRUCTION
Component3b:UsingQuestioningandDiscussion
Techniques
Teacher’squestions
areofuniformly
highquality,with
adequatetimefor
studentstorespond.
Studentsformulate
questions.
Studentsassume
responsibilityforthe
successofthe
discussion,making
unsolicited
contributionsand
assistingothersin
thediscussion.
Mostofthe
teacher’s
questionsareof
highquality.
Adequatetimeis
providedfor
studentsto
respond.
Teachercreatesa
genuine
discussionamong
students,
steppingaside
when
appropriate.
Teacher’squestionsare
acombinationoflow
andhighquality,posed
inrapidsuccession.Only
someinviteathoughtful
response.
Teachermakessome
attempttoengage
studentsingenuine
discussionratherthan
recitation,with
uneven
results.
Teacher’squestions
arevirtuallyallof
poorquality,with
lowcognitive
challengeandsingle
correctresponses,
andtheyareaskedin
rapidsuccession.
Interactionbetween
teacherandstudents
ispredominantly
recitationstyle,with
theteacher
mediatingall
questionsand
answers.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page28
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN3:INSTRUCTION
Component3c:EngagingStudentsinLearning
Allstudentsare
engagedinthe
activitiesand
assignmentsintheir
explorationof
content.Students
initiateoradapt
activitiesand
projectstoenhance
theirunderstanding.

Thelesson’s
structureis
coherent.Pacingof
thelessonis
appropriateforall
students.
Teacher’s
explanationof
contentisengaging
andconnectswith
students’knowledge
andexperience.
Studentscontribute
toexplaining
conceptstotheir
peers.
Mostactivities
andassignments
areappropriate
tostudents,and
moststudents
areengagedin
exploring
content.
Thelessonhasa
definedstructure
aroundwhichthe
activitiesare
organized.Pacing
ofthelessonis
appropriatefor
moststudents.
Teacher’s
explanationof
contentis
appropriateand
connectswith
students’
knowledgeand
experience.
Someactivitiesand
assignmentsare
appropriatetosome
students,butothersare
notengaged.
Thelessonhassome
recognizablestructure,
althoughitisnot
uniformlymaintained
throughoutthelesson.
Pacingofthelessonis
inconsistent.
Teacher’s
explanationof
thecontentisuneven;
someisdoneskillfully,
butotherportionsare
difficulttofollow.
Activitiesand
assignmentsare
inappropriatefor
students.Students
arenotengagedin
them.
Thelessonhasno
structure,orthe
paceofthelessonis
toosloworrushed,
orboth.
Teacher’s
explanationofthe
contentisunclearor
confusing.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page29
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN3:INSTRUCTION
Component3d:UsingAssessmentinInstruction
Studentsarefully
awareofthecriteria
andperformance
standardsbywhich
theirworkwillbe
evaluatedandhave
contributedtothe
developmentofthe
criteria.
Teacheractivelyand
systematicallyelicits
diagnostic
informationfrom
individualstudents.
Teacher’sfeedback
tostudentsistimely
andofconsistently
highquality,and
students
makeuse
ofthefeedbackin
theirlearning.
Studentsarefully
awareofthe
criteriaand
performance
standardsby
whichtheirwork
willbeevaluated.
Teachermonitors
theprogressof
groupsof
studentsinthe
curriculum,
makinglimited
useofdiagnostic
promptstoelicit
information.
Teacher’s
feedbackto
students
istimely
andof
consistentlyhigh
quality.
Studentsknowsomeof
thecriteriaand
performancestandards
bywhichtheirworkwill
beevaluated.
Teachermonitorsthe
progressoftheclassas
awholebutelicitsno
diagnosticinformation.
Teacher’sfeedbackto
studentsisuneven,and
its
timelinessis
inconsistent.
Studentsarenot
awareofthecriteria
andperformance
standardsbywhich
theirworkwillbe
evaluated.
Teacherdoesnot
monitorstudent
learninginthe
curriculum.

Teacher’sfeedback
tostudentsisofpoor
qualityandnot
providedinatimely
manner.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page30
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN3:INSTRUCTION
Component3e:DemonstratingFlexibility
andResponsiveness
Teacherseizes
opportunitiesto
enhancelearning,
buildingonstudent
interestsora
spontaneousevent.
Teacherpersistsin
seekingeffective
approachesfor
studentswhohave
difficultylearning,
usinganextensive
repertoireof
strategies.
Teacher
successfully
accommodates
students’
questionsor
interests.
Teacherpersistsin
seeking
approachesfor
studentswho
havedifficulty
learning,drawing
onarepertoireof
strategies.
Teacherattemptsto
accommodatestudents’
questionsorinterests,
althoughthepacingof
thelessonisdisrupted.
Teacheraccepts
responsibilityforthe
successofallstudents
buthasonlyalimited
repertoireof
instructionalstrategies
todrawon.
Teacherignoresor
brushesaside
students’questions
orinterests.
Whenastudenthas
difficultylearning,
theteachereither
givesuporblames
thestudentorthe
student’shome
environment.

SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page31
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
DOMAIN4:ProfessionalResponsibilities
Effectiveeducatorsdemonstratetheircommitmenttohighethicalandprofessionalstandards
andseektoimprovetheirpractice.ComponentsofDomain4include:
CommunicatingwithStudents
o ExpectationsforLearning
o DirectionsandProcedures
o ExplanationsofContent
o UseofOralandWrittenLanguage
UsingQuestioningandDiscussionTechniques
o QualityofQuestions
o DiscussionTechniques
o Student Participation
EngagingStudentsinLearning
o ActivitiesandAssignments
o Grouping ofStudents
o InstructionalMaterialsandResources
o Structure andPacing
UsingAssessmentinInstruction
o AssessmentCriteria
o Monitoring ofStudentLearning
o FeedbacktoStudents
o Student SelfAssessmentandMonitoringofProgress
DemonstratingFlexibilityandResponsiveness
o Lesson Adjustment
o ResponsetoStudents
Persistence
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page32
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
DOMAIN4
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN4:REFLECTINGONTEACHING
Component4a:ReflectingonTeaching
(Afterthe
observation)
Teachermakesa
thoughtfuland
accurateself
reflectionbasedon
theextenttowhich
itachieved
instructional
outcomes,cites
specificexamples
fromthelessonand
weighstherelative
strengthsofeach.
Drawingonan
extensiverepertoire
ofskills,teacher
offersspecific
alternativeactions,
completewiththe
probable
successof
differentcoursesof
action.
Teachermakesan
accurateself
reflectionbased
onandthe
extenttowhichit
achieved
instructional
outcomesand
cancitegeneral
referencesto
supportthe
judgment.
Teachermakesa
fewspecific
suggestionsof
whatcouldbe
triedanother
timethelessonis
taught.
Teacher
hasagenerally
accurateimpressionofa
lesson’seffectiveness
andtheextenttowhich
instructionaloutcomes
weremet.
Teachermakesgeneral
suggestionsabouthowa
lessoncouldbe
improvedanothertime
thelessonistaught.
Teacherdoesnot
knowwhethera
lessonwaseffective
orachievedits
instructional
outcomes,orteacher
profoundly
misjudgesthe
successofalesson.
Teacherhasno
suggestionsforhow
alessoncouldbe
improvedanother
timethelessonis
taught.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page33
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN4:REFLECTINGONTEACHING
Component4b:MaintainingAccurateRecords
Teacher’ssystemfor
maintaining
informationon
studentprogressin
learningisfully
effective.Students
contribute
informationand
participatein
interpretingthe
records.

Teacher’ssystem
formaintaining
informationon
student
completionof
assignmentsand
studentprogress
inlearningisfully
effective.
Teacher’ssystemfor
maintaininginformation
onstudentcompletion
of
assignmentsandon
studentprogressin
learningisrudimentary
andonlypartially
effective.
Teacher’ssystemfor
maintaining
informationon
studentcompletion
ofassignmentsisin
disarrayandthereis
nosystemfor
maintaining
informationon
studentprogressin
learning.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page34
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN4:REFLECTINGONTEACHING
Component4c:CommunicatingwithFamilies
Teacherprovides
frequent
informationto
families,as
appropriate,about
theinstructional
program.Students
havethe
opportunityto
participatein
preparingmaterials
fortheirfamilies
and
Teacher’seffortsto
engagefamiliesin
theinstructional
programare
frequentand
successful.
Responsetofamily
concernsishandled
withgreat
professionaland
culturalsensitivity.
Studentscontribute
ideasforprojects
thatcouldbe
enhancedbyfamily
participation.
Teacherprovides
frequent
informationto
families,as
appropriate,
aboutthe
instructional
program.and
makeseffortsto
engagefamiliesin
theinstructional
programare
frequentand
successful.
Teacher
communicates
withfamilies
aboutstudents’
progressona
regular
basis,
respecting
culturalnorms,
andisavailableas
neededto
respondtofamily
concerns.
Teacherparticipatesin
theschool’sactivities
forfamily
communicationbut
offerslittleadditional
information.andmakes
partiallysuccessful
attemptstoengage
familiesinthe
instructionalprogram.
Teacheradherestothe
school’srequired
proceduresfor
communicatingwith
families.Responsesto
familyconcernsare
minimalormayreflect
occasionalinsensitivity
toculturalnorms.
Teacherprovides
littleorno
informationabout
theinstructional
programtofamilies.
andmakesno
attempttoengage
familiesinthe
instructional
program.

Teacherprovides
minimalinformation
tofamiliesabout
individualstudents,
orthe
communicationis
inappropriatetothe
culturesofthe
families.Teacher
doesnotrespond,or
responds
insensitively,to
familyconcerns
aboutstudents.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page35
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN4:REFLECTINGONTEACHING
Component4d:ParticipatinginProfessionalCommunity
Relationshipswith
colleaguesare
characterizedby
mutualsupportand
cooperation.
Teachertakes
initiativein
assumingleadership
amongthefaculty.
Teachervolunteers
toparticipatein
schoolordistrict
events/projects,
makinga
contributionin
schoollife/district
projectsassuminga
leadershiprole.
Relationshipswith
colleaguesare
characterizedby
mutualsupport
andcooperation.
and
actively
participatesina
cultureof
professional
inquiry.
Teacher
volunteersto
participatein
schooland/or
district
events/projects,
makinga
contribution.
Teachermaintains
cordialrelationships
withcolleaguestofulfill
dutiesthattheschoolor
districtrequires.and
becomesinvolvedinthe
school’scultureof
inquirywheninvitedto
doso.
Teacherparticipatesin
schooland/ordistrict
events/projectswhen
specificallyasked.
Teacher’s
relationshipswith
colleaguesare
negativeorself
serving.
Teacheravoids
participationina
cultureofinquiry.
Teacheravoids
becominginvolvedin
schooland/ordistrict
events/projects.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page36
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Component
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN4:REFLECTINGONTEACHING
Component4e:GrowingandDevelopingProfessionally
Teacherseeksout
opportunitiesfor
professional
developmentand
makesasystematic
efforttoconduct
actionresearch.
Teacherseeksout
feedbackon
teachingfromboth
supervisorsand
colleagues.
Teacherinitiates
importantactivities
tocontributetothe
profession.
Teacherseeksout
opportunitiesfor
professional
developmentto
enhancecontent
knowledgeand
pedagogicalskill.
Teacher
welcomes
feedbackfrom
colleagueswhen
madeby
supervisorsor
when
opportunities
arisethrough
professional
collaboration.
Teacher
participates
activelyin
assistingother
educators.
Teacherparticipatesin
professionalactivitiesto
alimitedextent.
Teacherreluctantly
acceptsfeedbackon
teachingperformance
frombothsupervisors
andprofessional
colleagues.

Teacherfindslimited
waystocontributeto
theprofession.
Teacherengagesin
noprofessional
development
activitiestoenhance
knowledgeorskill.
Teacherresists
feedbackonteaching
performancefrom
eithersupervisorsor
moreexperienced
colleagues.
Teachermakesno
efforttoshare
knowledgewith
othersorto
assume
professional
responsibilities.
LEVELOFPERFORMANCE
HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING/NEEDS
IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY
DOMAIN4:REFLECTINGONTEACHING
Component4f:ShowingProfessionalism
Teachercanbe
countedontohold
thehighest
standardsof
honesty,integrity,
andconfidentiality
andtakesa
leadershiprolewith
colleagues.
Teachercomplies
fullywithschooland
districtregulations,
takingaleadership
rolewithcolleagues
tohelpensurethat
suchdecisionsare
basedonthe
highestprofessional
standards.
Teacher
displays
highstandardsof
honesty,integrity,
and
confidentialityin
interactionswith
colleagues,
students,andthe
public.
Teachercomplies
fullywithschool
anddistrict
regulationsand
participatesin
teamor
departmental
decisionmaking.
Teacherishonestin
interactionswith
colleagues,students,
andthepublic.
Teachercomplies
minimallywithschool
anddistrictregulations,
doingjustenoughtoget
by.Teacherdecisions
arebasedonlimited
professional
consideration.
Teacherdisplays
dishonestyin
interactionswith
colleagues,students,
andthepublic.
Teacherdoesnot
complywithschool
anddistrict
regulations.Teacher
decisionsarebased
onselfserving
criteria.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page37
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
The following optional chart is provided for your convenience to display the crosswalk of the
district’s evaluation framework to the Educator Accomplished Practices. Other methods to
display information are acceptable, as long as each standard and descriptor is addressed.
Alignment to the Florida Educator Accomplished Practices (FEAP)
Practice Evaluation Indicators
1. Instructional Design and Lesson Planning
Applying concepts from human development and learning theories, the effective educator consistently:
a. Aligns instruction with state-adopted standards at the appropriate level of rigor;
1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e
b. Sequences lessons and concepts to ensure coherence and required prior knowledge;
1a, 1b, 1c, 1e
c. Designs instruction for students to achieve mastery;
1b, 1e, 1f
d. Selects appropriate formative assessments to monitor learning;
1f
e. Uses diagnostic student data to plan lessons; and,
1b, 1e, 1f, 3d
f. Develops learning experiences that require students to demonstrate a variety of applicable skills and
competencies.
1e
2. The Learning Environment
To maintain a student-centered learning environment that is safe, organized, equitable, flexible, inclusive, and collaborative, the effective educator
consistently:
a. Organizes, allocates, and manages the resources of time, space, and attention;
2c, 2e
b. Manages individual and class behaviors through a well-planned management system;
2d, 2c
c. Conveys high expectations to all students;
2b
d. Respects students’ cultural linguistic and family background;
2a
e. Models clear, acceptable oral and written communication skills;
3a
f. Maintains a climate of openness, inquiry, fairness and support;
2a, 2b
g. Integrates current information and communication technologies;
Domain 1, 3, 4
h. Adapts the learning environment to accommodate the differing needs and diversity of students; and
Domain 1, 3
i. Utilizes current and emerging assistive technologies that enable students to participate in high-quality
communication interactions and achieve their educational goals.
Domain 1, 3, 4
3. Instructional Delivery and Facilitation
The effective educator consistently utilizes a deep and comprehensive knowledge of the subject taught to:
a. Deliver engaging and challenging lessons;
3c
b. Deepen and enrich students’ understanding through content area literacy strategies, verbalization of thought,
and application of the subject matter;
3c
c. Identify gaps in students’ subject matter knowledge;
3d
d. Modify instruction to respond to preconceptions or misconceptions;
3e
e. Relate and integrate the subject matter with other disciplines and life experiences;
1e, 3c
f. Employ higher-order questioning techniques;
3b
g. Apply varied instructional strategies and resources, including appropriate technology, to provide
comprehensible instruction, and to teach for student understanding;
1a, 1d, 2e, 3c
h. Differentiate instruction based on an assessment of student learning needs and recognition of individual
differences in students;
1b, 3d, 3c
i. Support, encourage, and provide immediate and specific feedback to students to promote student achievement;
2b, 3d
j. Utilize student feedback to monitor instructional needs and to adjust instruction.
3d, 3e
4. Assessment
The effective educator consistently:
a. Analyzes and applies data from multiple assessments and measures to diagnose students’ learning needs,
informs instruction based on those needs, and drives the learning process;
1b, 1c, 1e, 3d
b. Designs and aligns formative and summative assessments that match learning objectives and lead to mastery;
1f
c. Uses a variety of assessment tools to monitor student progress, achievement and learning gains;
3d
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page38
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
d. Modifies assessments and testing conditions to accommodate learning styles and varying levels of knowledge;
1f, 3d, 3e
e. Shares the importance and outcomes of student assessment data with the student and the student’s
parent/caregiver(s); and,
3d, 4c
f. Applies technology to organize and integrate assessment information.
Domain 1, 3, 4, 4b
5. Continuous Professional Improvement
The effective educator consistently:
a. Designs purposeful professional goals to strengthen the effectiveness of instruction based on students’ needs;
b. Examines and uses data-informed research to improve instruction and student achievement;
c. Uses a variety of data, independently, and in collaboration with colleagues, to evaluate learning outcomes,
adjust planning and continuously improve the effectiveness of the lessons;
d. Collaborates with the home, school and larger communities to foster communication and to support student
learning and continuous improvement;
e. Engages in targeted professional growth opportunities and reflective practices; and,
f. Implements knowledge and skills learned in professional development in the teaching and learning process.
6. Professional Responsibility and Ethical Conduct
Understanding that educators are held to a high moral standard in a community, the effective educator adheres to
the Code of Ethics and the Principles of Professional Conduct of the Education Profession of Florida, pursuant to
Rules 6A-10.080 and 6A-10.081, F.A.C., and fulfills the expected obligations to students, the public and the
education profession.
3. OtherIndica torsofPerformance
Directions:
Thedistrictshallprovide:
Theadditionalperformanceindicators,ifthedistrictchoosestoincludesuchadditional
indicatorspursuanttos.1012.34(3)(a)4.,F.S.;
IndividualProfessionalDevelopmentPlan
Thepercentageofthefinalevaluationthatisbasedupontheadditionalindicators;and
Thescoringmethod,includinghowitiscalculatedandcombined[Rule6A5.030(2)(d),
F.A.C.].
Individual Professional Development Plan counts for 16.7% of the Instructional Practice
Score.TheProfessionalDevelopmentPlanwillberatedusingarubric.Pointsforeachrating
areasfollows:HighlyEffective=4(.668),Effective=3(.5001),NeedsImprovement=2(.3334),
Unsatisfactory=1(.1667).Thecalculationforthesummativeevaluationisaweightedaverage
of the teacher observation data plus the student learning growth data as shown in the
formulabelow:
FinalSummativeEvaluationRating=(.1667xProfessionalGrowthPlan)+(.5xStudent
LearningGrowth)+(.5(.2xa+.3xb+.3xc+.2xd))
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page39
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
ThispointtotalwillbecombinedwiththeInstructionalPracticescoreandthe
VAM/GrowthScoretocreateaFinalAnnualEvaluationscoreandrating.
Thecalculatedfinalratingiscomparedtothecategoriesbelowtoassignthe
classificationlevel.
HighlyEffective
Effective
NeedsImprovement/
Developing
Unsatisfactory
3.5
4.0 2.5
3.49 1.5
2.49 1.0
1.49
Examplesincludethefollowing:
DeliberatePractice‐theselectionofindicatorsorpractices,improvementonwhichis
measuredduringanevaluationperiod
PeerReviews
Objectivelyreliablesurveyinformationfromstudentsandparentsbasedonteaching
practicesthatareconsistentlyassociatedwithhigherstudentachievement
IndividualProfessionalDevelopmentPlan
Otherindicators,asselectedbythedistrict
DELIBERATEPRACTICE‐PROFESSIONALDEVELOPMENTPLAN
OVERVIEW
TheProfessionalDevelopmentPlanwillbeusedtosupportateacher’sgrowth.Incollaboration
with the school administrator, teachers will receive feedback that is timely, ongoing,
constructive,andfocusedonspecificobservedbehaviorsandstudentlearningdata.ThePDPis
designedtofacilitatedeliberate practice, a highly mentallydemandingprocess,requiring high
levelsoffocusandconcentrationintentonimprovingtheteacher’sperformance.Itprovidesfor
selfreflection, SMART goalsetting, focused relevant practice and specific feedback for all
teachers,regardlessofexperienceandexpertise.

PROCEDURES
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page40
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
The employee, or employee team, completes the demographic information in the
beginningofthePDP.
The employee begins to develop the PDP SMART goals/objectives, strategies and
timelines.Thefinalgoal(s)aredevelopedandthefinaldraftofthePDPispreparedwithinthe
“MyProfessionalGrowthPlan”platformandacknowledgedby
theteacher andthesupervisor
prior to the end of the first quarter.Conferences may be held but are not required unless
requested by the teacher or administrator.The PDP for teachers new to the district is to be
completed following the Initial Screening or the first post observation conference.The PDP
timelineincludesaproposeddateforafinalconferencetooccurpriortothecompletionofthe
SummativeEvaluation.
IfthetimelineprovidesforamidyearPDPmonitoringconferencetheteacherreflectson
theprogresstodateandcompletestheMonitorandReviewpriortotheconferenceon
thePDP.
ThesupervisorprovidesfeedbackthroughtheMonitorandReviewsectionofthePDPduringthe
midyearconferenceforteachersnewtothedistrictpriortothecompletionoftheFirstSemester
SummativeEvaluation.
PriortothefinalconferenceonthePDP,theteacherreflectsonthegoals,strategiesand
outcomesofthePDPandcompletestheProfessionalDevelopmentPlanEvaluationsectionofthe
PDP.ThesupervisorprovidesfeedbackduringtheconferencepertainingtothePDPEvaluation
section.The final PDP conference also provides the review and rating of the PDP using the
ContinuousProfessionalDevelopmentrubric.ThePDPratingwillaccountfor16.7%ofthefinal
evaluationscore.
ProfessionalDevelopmentPlanRubric:
HighlyEffective:
The Professional Development Plan demonstrated a direct correlation to needs indicated by student assessment
and/ordataandtheeducator’spreviousevaluation, credentialsand/orselfassessment.TwoormoreSMARTgoals
wereset.Strategieswerespecific,fullydevelopedandfocusedonimprovingorchangingprofessionalpracticeforthe
purposes of improved student
learning. The educator reviewed his/her plan during the school year, and readily
adjusted the plan only when ongoing evidence indicated the need. The educator not only completed all activities
identified in growthplan,butidentifiedstrategies and resultingevidence thatultimately improved orchangedthe
educator’s practice in an effort to improve student learning. The educator’s reflection provided extensive and
thorough evidence of why the educator implemen ted those strategies and how and why the chosen strategies
improvedorchangedhis/her
practice.Inthecourseofimplementingtheplan,theeducatorcollaboratedwithother
educatorsinadeliberateandmeaningfulway.Resultsoftheplanwereeffectivelysharedandimpactedthepractice
ofothers.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page41
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Effective:
The Professional Development Plan demonstrated a direct correlation to needs indicated by student assessment
and/orlearningdataandtheeducator’spreviousevaluation,credentialsand/orselfassessment.AtleastoneSMART
goalwassetthatalignswiththeFloridaEducatorAccomplishedPractices. Strategieswerespecific,welldeveloped
and focused on improving or
changing professional practice for the purposes of improved student learning. The
educator reviewed his/her plan during the school year and, only if necessary, made adjustments to the plan. The
educator completed all activities identified in growth plan and produced evidence that identified strategies were
implementedintheclassroom.Theeducator’sreflectionmadeadequateconnectionsbetweenstudentdataandthe
strategiestheeducatorchosetoimplement.Inthecourseof implementingtheplan,theeducatorcollaboratedwith
othereducatorsina
meaningfulway.Resultsoftheplanweresharedwithdepartmentsorgradelevelsandmayhave
hadanimpactonsomecolleagues.
NeedsImprovement/Developing:
TheProfessionalDevelopmentPlandemonstratedsomecorrelationtoneedsindicatedbystudentassessmentand/or
learningdataandtheeducator’spreviousevaluation,credentialsand/orselfassessment.Alearninggoalwassetbut
was missingone or morecomponents ofa SMART goal.The goalmaynot have alignedwiththe Florida Educator
Accomplished Practices.Strategies were looselyfocused on improving or changing professional practice for the
purposesofimprovedstudentlearning.Theeducatorreviewedhis/herplanduringtheschoolyear,butmadefewor
noadjustmentstotheplanunlesssuggestedbytheevaluator.Theeducator’sreflectiondemonstratedthathe/she
completedmost
orallactivitiesidentifiedinthegrowthplan,butprovidedlimitedevidenceofimplementationorhow
itimprovedorchangedhis/herpractice.Theeducator’sattemptstocollaborate withotherswerenotdeliberateand
contributedlittletotheevidence.Resultsoftheplanwereminimallysharedwithothers.
Unsatisfactory:
The Professional Development Plan did not directly correlate to needs indicated by student assessment and/or
learningdataandtheeducator’spreviousevaluation,credentialsand/orselfassessment.Alearninggoalwasmissing
oralearninggoalwassetbutlackedtheclarityofaSMARTgoal.Strategieswerenotclearordid
notspecificallyfocus
onimprovingorchangingprofessionalpracticeforthepurposesofimprovedstudentlearning.Theeducatorreviewed
his/herplanduringtheschoolyearbutdidnotrecognizeoraccepttheneedtomakeadjustmentstotheplan. The
educator’s reflection (if one exists) provided little evidence that the
strategies were implemented or how those
strategiesimprovedorchangedhis/herpractice.Therewasminimalornoevidencetosupporttheplan.Theeducator
didnotcollaboratewithothersinameaningfulway.Resultsoftheplanwerenotsharedwithothers.

SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page42
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
4. SummativeEvaluationScore
Directions:
Thedistrictshallprovide:
Thesummativeevaluationform(s);and
The Manatee County Teacher Final Summative Evaluation Form and the MidYear
SummativeEvaluationFormareusedtosummarizetheteacher’sperformancerelated
tothefourDomainsincludedintheDanielsonFrameworkforTeaching.Thesummary
formisnotto
beusedasachecklistorobservationinstrument.Allareasdeterminedto
belessthaneffectivemusthavesupportingdocumentationintheteacher'sfileatthe
schoolsite.Allareasmarked“HighlyEffective”musthavesupportingdocumentationin
theteacher’sfileattheschoolsite.
TheMidYearSummative
EvaluationFormandtheFinalSummativeEvaluationFormare
to be completed during a conference with a teacher. The data upon which the
completion of the form is based may come from a variety of sources: supervisor
observation forms or notations, the Initial Screening Form, Walkthrough observation
forms, the teacher's individualized Professional Development Plan (PDP), portfolios,
sampleteacherandstudentproducts,conferencenotesandthelike.
TheMidYearSummativeEvaluationFormandtheFinalSummativeEvaluationFormare
mosteffectivewhentheycapture theitems observedutilizingtheTeacher Evaluation
Observation Tools, Walkthrough Observation Tools and portfolio formsincluding the
PDP. All data sources used for evaluation purposes must be kept at the school in the
teacher'spersonnelfileandsharedwiththeteacher.
No item can be marked “Highly Effective,” “Needs Improvement/Developing” or
“Unsatisfactory”unlessthereissupportingdocumentation.
Thescoringmethod,includinghow
itiscalculatedandcombined;and
The calculation for the summative evaluation is a weighted average of the teacher
observationdataplusthestudentlearninggrowthdataasshownintheformulabelow:
FinalSummativeEvaluationRating=(.5(.2xa+.3xb+.3xc+.2xd))
A=20%‐PlanningandPreparation
B=30%‐ClassroomEnvironment
C=30%‐Instruction
D=20%‐ProfessionalResponsibilities
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page43
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
TheFinalSummativeEvaluationiscombinedwiththeProfessionalDevelopmentPlanscore
andtheVAMorStudentGrowthScoretocalculateaFinalAnnualScore.
33.3%(SPM)+16.7%(PDP)+50%(IPS)=FinalSummativeScore
Thecalculatedfinalratingiscomparedtothecategoriesbelowtoassignthe
classificationlevel.
HighlyEffective
Effective
NeedsImprovement/
Developing
Unsatisfactory
3.5
4.0 2.5
3.49 1.5
2.49 1.0
1.49
Theperformancestandardsusedtodeterminethesummativeevaluationrating.
Districtsshallusethefourperformancelevelsprovidedins.1012.34(2)(e),F.S.
[Rule6A5.030(2)(e),F.A.C.].
Basedonthedemonstrationofeffectiveteachinganddocumentedimprovementin
studentperformance,anevaluationismadebytheprincipalor
programadministrator
as to overall “Highly Effective”, “Effective”, “Needs Improvement/Developing” or
“Unsatisfactory”performance.Thisjudgmentforms thebasisoftheFirst Semesteror
Annual Summative Evaluation, but must reflect data collected during the evaluation
cycle,summarizedontheappropriateformsandsharedduringanannualorendoffirst
semesterconference.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page44
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)

SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page45
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
5. AdditionalRequirements
Directions:
Thedistrictshallprovide:
Confirmationthatthedistrictprovidesinstructionalpersonneltheopportunityto
reviewtheirclassrostersforaccuracyandtocorrectanymistakes[Rule6A
5.030(2)(f)1.,F.A.C.]
Teacherswillhavethereviewtheirclassrostersthroughtherosterverification
process.
Documentationthattheevaluatoristheindividualwhoisresponsibleforsupervising
theemployee.Anevaluatormayconsiderinputfromotherpersonneltrainedin
evaluationpractices.Ifinputisprovidedbyotherpersonnel,identifytheadditional
positionsorpersons. Examplesincludeassistantprincipals,peers,districtstaff,
departmentheads,gradelevelchairpersons,orteamleaders[Rule6A5.030(2)(f)2.,
F.A.C.].
Teacherstobeevaluatedandadministratorsresponsibleforevaluatingteachers
mustbetrainedpriortoanyinitialscreening,observations,walkthroughsorany
evaluationofateacher’sperformance.
Theannualfinalevaluationisbasedondatacollectedduringtheyearbythe
principal,assistantprincipal,projectmanager,programcoordinatororhis/her
designee,andtheteacher.
Descriptionoftrainingprogramsandprocessestoensurethatallemployeessubject
toanevaluationsystemareinformedonevaluationcriteria,datasources,
methodologies,andproceduresassociatedwiththeevaluationbeforethe
evaluationtakesplace,andthatallindividualswithevaluationresponsibilitiesand
those
whoprovideinputtowardevaluationunderstandtheproperuseofthe
evaluationcriteriaandprocedures[Rule6A5.030(2)(f)3.,F.A.C.].
Teacherstobeevaluatedandadministratorsresponsibleforevaluatingteachers
mustbetrainedpriortoanyinitialscreening,observations,walkthroughsorany
evaluationofateacher’sperformance.Trainingwillbeprovidedbythedesignated
ManateeCountyTeacherEvaluationCommitteemembers.Eachyearevaluatorswill
beprovidedareviewoftheevaluationsystemaswellasupdatesonany
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page46
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
modificationsmadetothesystem.Newevaluatorswillreceivetrainingbymembers
oftheevaluationcommitteepriortoobservingteachers.
Descriptionofprocessesforprovidingtimelyfeedbacktotheindividualbeing
evaluated[Rule6A5.030(2)(f)4.,F.A.C.].
Datacollectedduringformalorinformalobservationsthataretobeusedfor
evaluationpurposesshallbesharedwiththeteachersinawrittenformthrough
“MyProfessionalGrowthPlan”platformwithinten(10)daysoftheobservation.
Descriptionofhowresultsfromtheevaluationsystemwillbeusedforprofessional
development[Rule6A5.030(2)(f)5.,F.A.C.].
TheprimarypurposeoftheManateeCountyPerformanceFeedbackProcessistoprovide
asoundbasisforteacherimprovementandprofessionalgrowththatwillincreasestudent
learninggrowth.Thisisaccomplishedthroughanevaluationofteachereffectivenessand
subsequent discussions between the teacher and a supervisor or other observer. The
processassumesthecompetenceofthemajorityofteachersandfocusesonprofessional
development in the context of student performance gains first, while documenting
competencyonanannualbasis.
Confirmationthatthedistrictwillrequireparticipationinspecificprofessional
developmentprogramsbythosewho havebeenevaluatedaslessthaneffectiveas
requiredbys.1012.98(10),F.S.[Rule6A5.030(2)(f)6.,F.A.C.].
Anyteacherevaluatedaslessthaneffectivewillberequiredtoparticipatein
professionaldevelopmentprogramsspecifictotheareasinwhichtheywererated
asneedsimprovementorunsatisfactory.Teachersmustprovidedocumentation
thattheysuccessfullycompletedtheprofessionaldevelopmentactivities.
Documentationthatallinstructionalpersonnelmustbeevaluatedatleastoncea
year[Rule6A5.030(2)(f)7.,F.A.C.].
All instructional personnel will be observed at least once during the year with new
teachers,probationaryteachers,andteachersnewtothedistrictbeingobservedatleast
twiceduringtheyear.
Documentationthatclassroomteachersareobservedandevaluatedatleastoncea
year[Rule6A5.030(2)(f)8.,F.A.C.].
Asummativeevaluationtakesplaceannuallyforallclassroomteachers
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page47
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Documentationthatclassroomteachersnewlyhiredbythedistrictareobserved
andevaluatedatleasttwiceinthefirstyearofteachinginthedistrictpursuant
tos.1012.34(3)(a),F.S.[Rule6A5.030(2)(f)8.,F.A.C.].
ManateeCountywillevaluateallnewlyhiredbythedistrictatleasttwiceinthe
firstyearofteachinginthedistrct.
Documentationthattheevaluationsystemforinstructionalpersonnelincludes
opportunitiesforparentstoprovideinputintoperformanceevaluationswhenthe
districtdeterminessuchinputisappropriate,andadescriptionofthecriteriafor
inclusion,andthemannerofinclusionofparentalinput[Rule6A5.030(2)(f)9.,
F.A.C.].
N/A
Identificationofteachingfields,ifany,forwhichspecialevaluationproceduresand
criteriaarenecessary[Rule6A5.030(2)(f)10.,F.A.C.].
N/A
Descriptionofthedistrict’speerassistanceprocess,ifany.Peerassistancemaybe
partoftheregularevaluationsystem,orusedtoassistpersonnelwhoareplacedon
performanceprobation,orwhorequestassistance,ornewlyhiredclassroom
teachers[Rule6A5.030(2)(f)11.,F.A.C.].
Mentorteachersareprovidedforallfirstyearteachers.Peerteachersmaybe
assignedattheschoollevelasdeterminedbythePrincipal.Teacherassistanceis
availabletoallteachersthroughtheOfficeofProfessionalLearning.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page48
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
ManateeCountyTeacherEvaluationSystem(MCTES)201516Cycle
A B C
TeachersNewTotheManatee
CountySchoolDistrictThisYear
(Theteacherhasnevertaught
inManateeCountyorifthey
havetaughtinManatee
Countybefore,therewa s a
separationofdutyforatleast
oneyear.)
TeachersInYearTwoOrMore
PreviouslyRatedLessThan
EffectiveInInstructional
Practice
TeachersInYearTwoOrMore
PreviouslyRatedEffectiveor
HighlyEffective
1walkthroughof710
minuteswithinthefirst
semester
1walkthroughof710
minuteswithinthefirst
semester
1walkthroughof710
minutesinthesemesterin
whichtheobservationoccurs
AnInitialScreeningvisitofat
least20minutesshalloccur
withinthefirst30daysofinitial
employmentorwithinthefirst
30daysoftheMyPGSonline
system(TNL)goinglive.
AnInitialScreeningvisitofat
least20minutesshalloccuror
withinthefirst30daysofthe
MyPGSonlinesystem(TNL)
goinglive.
DevelopmentofPDPduring
firstquarter
DevelopmentofProfessional
GrowthPlan/Deliberate
Practice(PDP)duringfirst
quarter
DevelopmentofPDPduring
firstquarter
Aminimumofone
observationofatleast30
minutespriortoDecember
15thorafterJanuary15
th
and
priortoMay15
th
includingapre
andpostobservation
conference
Aminimumofone
observationofatleast30
minutespriortoDecember
15thincludingapreandpost
observationconference
Aminimumofone
observationofatleast30
minutespriortoDecember
15thincludingapreandpost
observationconference
Postobservationconference
withinten(10)
daysfollowing
observation
Postobservationconference
withinten(10)daysfollowing
observation
Postobservationconference
withinten(10)daysfollowing
observation
2walkthroughsof710
minuteseachinthesemester
inwhichanobservationdoes
notoccur
ReviewofPDPpriorto
completingmidyear
summativeevaluation.
Electronicacknowledgment
required,butteacheror
administratormayrequest
facetofacemeeting.
2walkthroughsof710
minuteseachwithinthesecond
semester
ReviewofthePDPpriorto
completingtheannual
summativeevaluation.
Electronicacknowledgment
required,butteacheror
administratormayrequestface
tofacemeeting.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page49
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Midyearsummative
evaluationattheendoffirst
semester
Aminimumofone
observationofatleast30
minutesafterJanuary15
th
and
priortoMay15
th
includingapre
andpostobservation
conference
Annualsummativeevaluation
priortoMay15
th
2walkthroughsof710
minuteseachwithinthe
secondsemester
Postobservationconference
withinten(10)daysfollowing
observation
Oneobservationofatleast
30minutesafterJanuary15
th
andpriortoMay15
th
including
apreandpostobservation
conference
ReviewofthePDPpriorto
completingtheannual
summativeevaluation.
Electronicacknowledgment
required,butteacheror
administratormayrequestface
tofacemeeting.
Postobservationconference
withinten(10)daysfollowing
observation
Annualsummativeevaluation
priortoMay15
th
ReviewofthePDPpriorto
completingtheannual
summativeevaluation.
Electronicacknowledgment
required,butteacheror
administratormayrequest
facetofacemeeting.
AnnualSummative
EvaluationpriortoMay15
th

SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page50
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
6. DistrictEvaluationProcedures
Directions:
ManateeCountywillprovideevidencethatitsevaluationpoliciesandprocedurescomply
withthefollowingstatutoryrequirements:
Inaccordancewiths.1012.34(3)(c),F.S.,theevaluatormust:
submitawrittenreportoftheevaluationtothedistrictschool
superintendentforthepurposeofreviewingtheemployee’scontract[Rule
6A5.030(2)(g)1.,F.A.C.].
Followingtheannualorendoffirstsemesterevaluationconference,thesite
administratorandstaffsigntheappropriatesummaryforms.Anelectroniccopyis
submittedtothehumanresourcesdepartmentwithinthetimelinesestablished
annually.
submitthewrittenreporttotheemployeenolaterthan10daysafterthe
evaluationtakesplace[Rule6A5.030(2)(g)2.,F.A.C.].
Datacollectedduringformalorinformalobservationsthataretobeusedforevaluation
purposesshallbesharedwiththeteachersinawrittenformthrough“MyProfessional
GrowthPlan”platformwithinten(10)daysoftheobservation.
discussthewritten
evaluationreportwiththeemployee[Rule6A
5.030(2)(g)3.,F.A.C.].
Datawillbesharedwiththeteacherthrough“MyProfessionalGrowthPlan”platformas
soonaspracticalforfeedbackanddiscussion.
Theemployeeshallhavetherighttoinitiateawrittenresponsetothe
evaluationandtheresponseshallbecome
apermanentattachmenttohisor
herpersonnelfile[Rule6A5.030(2)(g)4.,F.A.C.].
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page51
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
The employee may provide a written response to any observation form, evaluation or
conference which shall be attached to the original report or form and included in the
individual'spersonnelfile.
Thedistrictshallprovideevidencethatitsevaluationproceduresfornotificationof
unsatisfactoryperformancecomplywiththerequirementsoutlinedins.1012.34(4),
F.S.[Rule6A5.030(2)(h),F.A.C.].
Should necessary improvements become apparent during the appraisal process, said
improvements shall be discussed with the employee and noted on the
observation/evaluationformtogetherwith:
o specificimprovement(s)desired,
o time forimprovement(s)tobemade,
o assistance tobeprovided,ifnecessary.
Documentationthedistricthascompliedwiththerequirementthatthedistrict
schoolsuperintendentshallannuallynotifytheDepartmentofanyinstructional
personnelwhoreceivetwoconsecutiveunsatisfactoryevaluationsandshallnotify
theDepartmentofanyinstructionalpersonnelwhoaregivenwrittennoticebythe
districtofintenttoterminateornotrenewtheiremployment,asoutlinedins.
1012.34(5),F.S.[Rule6A5.030(2)(i),F.A.C.].
Instructionalpersonnelwhoreceivetwoconsecutive overall“Unsatisfactory”evaluations
willbeidentified bythehumanresourcesdepartment. TheSuperintendentshall notify
theDepartmentofEducationofthoseindividuals,utilizingproceduresdescribedinState
BoardRule.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page52
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
7. DistrictSelfMonitoring
Directions:
Thedistrictshallprovideadescriptionofitsprocessforannuallymonitoringitsevaluation
system.Thedistrictselfmonitoringshalldeterminethefollowing:
Evaluators’understandingoftheproperuseofevaluationcriteriaandprocedures,
includingevaluatoraccuracyandinterraterreliability;[Rule6A5.030(2)(j)1.,F.A.C.]
Evaluatorsparticipateinannualevaluationcalibration/interraterreliability
trainings.AllAdministratorsviewaCharlotteDanielsonvideoandthenhavetorate
itasifitwereanobservation.Wethencompare tocheckforinterraterreliability.
WecontinuetocalibratewithvideosfromCharlotteDanielsonduringoursmall
groupprincipalandassistantprincipalmeetingsthroughouttheyear.
Evaluatorsprovidenecessaryandtimelyfeedbacktoemployeesbeingevaluated;
[Rule6A5.030(2)(j)2.,F.A.C.]
Evaluatorsarerequiredtoprovidetimelyfeedbacktoemployeesbeingevaluated.
Timelimitsvarywithactivity,howeverthegeneralpracticeistoprovidefeedbackin
nolessthan10fromthetimetheevidencewascollected.Thisincludesourpost
conferencewithratingsaswellastheacknowledgementwithinourprogramto
showteachershaveseentheevidenceandratings.
Evaluatorsfollowdistrictpoliciesandproceduresintheimplementationof
evaluationsystem(s);[Rule6A5.030(2)(j)3.,F.A.C.]
Evaluatorsarerequiredtoevaluateinstructional
employeesbasedontheirassigned
evaluationcycle;A(newtoManateeCounty),B(ratedlessthanEffectiveyear
before)orC(ratedEffectiveorHighlyEffective)theyearbefore.Eachcyclehas
differentcriteriaforevaluatinginstructionalpersonnel.
Useofevaluationdatatoidentifyindividualprofessionaldevelopment;[Rule6A
5.030(2)(j)4.,F.A.C.]
Evaluatorsmayrecommendorrequirespecificprofessionaldevelopmenttoan
instructionalemployeebasedonevaluationdata.Whenateachershowsa
weaknessbasedontheobjectiverubricperCharlotteDanielson.Administratorscan
assignprofessionaldevelopmentwithinourprogramMyPGS.Wehavebuiltseveral
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page53
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
PDtrainingsincludingthosefromCharlotteDanielsonandEducationalImpact.
Teachersalsoreceivepointsforcoursestheytakewithinoursystem.
Useofevaluationdatatoinformschoolanddistrictimprovementplans[Rule6A
5.030(2)(j)5.,F.A.C.].
EvaluationdataistakenintoconsiderationwhencreatingSchoolImprovement
Plans.Eachschoolcanpulldatatoseestrengthsandweaknesseswithinthe
building.Forinstanceifquestioningtechniquesisaweaknesswithinthebuilding,
thedistrictwouldexpecttoseethisasagoalwithintheSIPplanwhenlookingto
improvestudentachievement.Itmayalsobelistedasastrategytohelpaparticular
goalrelatedtoincreasingstudentachievementwiththeSIPplan.
ThedistrictpersonnelandprincipalsmeetannuallytoreviewtheInstructionalEvaluationSystemto
determinecompliancewiththeFloridaStatute.Theteamusuallymeetsinthesummerofeachyearto
evaluatetheeffectivenessofthesystem.Duringthereview,theteamdeterminesif:
Theevaluatorunderstandsofthe
properuseofevaluationcriteriaandprocedures,including
evaluatoraccuracyandinterraterreliability.
Theevaluatorprovidesnecessaryandtimelyfeedbacktotheemployeesbeingevaluated.
Theuseofevaluationdataisusedtoidentifyindividualprofessionaldevelopment.
Theuseofevaluationdataisusedtoinformschool
anddistrictimprovementplan.
Theteamlooksattheperformanceevaluationresultsfromthepriorschoolyearforallinstructional
personnelusingthefourlevelsofperformance.Theperformanceevaluationresultsforinstructional
personnelaredisaggregatedbyclassroomteacherandallotherinstructionalpersonnel;byschoolsite;
andbyinstructional
level.Schoolgradesandstateandlocalassessmentdataarealsoreviewedby
schoolanddistrictandcomparedtotheperformanceevaluationdata.Resultsofthisdataanalysisare
usedbyindividualschoolsandthedistricttosetschoolimprovementgoalsandplanforindividual,
schoolanddistrictprofessionaldevelopment
activities.
Changesandrevisionstotheteacherevaluationsystemwillberecommended.Allsubstantialrevisions
willbereviewedandapprovedbythedistrictschool boardbeforebeingusedtoevaluateteachers.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page54
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)

SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page55
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
AppendixAChecklistforApproval
PerformanceofStudents
Thedistricthasprovidedandmeetsthefollowingcriteria:
Forallinstructionalpersonnel:
Thepercentageoftheevaluationthatisbasedontheperformanceof
studentscriterion.
Anexplanationofthescoringmethod,includinghowitiscalculatedand
combined.
Atleastonethirdoftheevaluationisbasedonperformanceofstudents.
Forclassroomteachersnewlyhiredbythedistrict:
Thestudentperformancemeasure(s).
Scoringmethodforeachevaluation,includinghowitiscalculatedand
combined.
Forallinstruct ionalpersonnel,confirmedtheinclusionofstudentperformance:
Dataforatleastthreeyears,including
thecurrentyearandthetwoyears
immediatelyprecedingthecurrentyear,whenavailable.
Iflessthanthethreemostrecentyearsofdataareavailable,thoseyears for
whichdataareavailablemustbeused.
Ifmorethanthreeyearsofstudentperformancedataareused,specifiedthe
yearsthatwillbeused.
Forclassroomteachersofstudentsforcoursesassessedbystatewide,standardized
assessments:
DocumentedthatVAMresultscompriseatleastonethirdoftheevaluation.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page56
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Forteachersassignedacombinationofcoursesthatareassociatedwiththe
statewide,standardizedassessmentsandthatarenot,theportionofthe
evaluationthatiscomprisedof theVAMresultsisidentified,andtheVAM
resultsaregivenproportionalweightaccordingtoamethodologyselectedby
thedistrict.
Forallinstruct ionalpersonnelofstudentsforcoursesnotassessedbystatewide,
standardizedassessments:
Forclassroomteachers,thedistrictdeterminedstudentperformance
measure(s)usedforpersonnelevaluations.
Forinstructionalpersonnelwhoarenotclassroomteachers,thedistrict
determinedstudentperformancemeasure(s)usedforpersonnelevaluations.
InstructionalPractice
Thedistricthasprovidedandmeetsthefollowingcriteria:
Forallinstructionalpersonnel:
Thepercentageoftheevaluationsystemthatisbasedontheinstructional
practicecriterion.
Atleastonethirdoftheevaluationisbasedoninstructionalpractice.
Anexplanationofthescoringmethod,includinghow
itiscalculatedand
combined.
Thedistrictevaluationframeworkforinstructionalpersonnelisbasedon
contemporaryresearchineffectiveeducationalpractices.
Forallinstructionalpersonnel:
Acrosswalkfromthedistrict'sevaluationframeworktotheEducator
AccomplishedPracticesdemonstratingthatthedistrict’sevaluationsystem
containsindicatorsbaseduponeachoftheEducatorAccomplishedPractices.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page57
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Forclassroomteachers:
Theobservationinstrument(s)thatincludeindicatorsbasedoneachofthe
EducatorAccomplishedPractices.
Fornonclassroominstructionalpersonnel:
Theevaluationinstrument(s)thatincludeindicatorsbasedoneachofthe
EducatorAccomplishedPractices.
Forallinstruct ionalpersonnel:
Proceduresforconductingobservationsandcollectingdataandother
evidenceofinstructionalpractice.
OtherIndicatorsofPerformance
Thedistricthasprovidedandmeetsthefollowingcriteria:
Describedtheadditionalperformanceindicators,ifany.
Thepercentageofthefinalevaluationthatisbasedupontheadditional
indicators.
Thescoringmethod,includinghowitiscalculatedandcombined.
SummativeEvaluationScore
Thedistricthasprovidedandmeetsthefollowingcriteria:
Summativeevaluationform(s).
Scoringmethod,includinghowitiscalculatedandcombined.
Theperformancestandardsusedtodeterminethesummativeevaluation
rating(thefourperformancelevels:highlyeffective,effective,needs
improvement/developing,unsatisfactory).
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page58
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
AdditionalRequirements
Thedistricthasprovidedandmeetsthefollowingcriteria:
Confirmationthatthedistrictprovidesinstructionalpersonnelthe
opportunitytoreviewtheirclassrostersforaccuracyandtocorrectany
mistakes.
Documentedthattheevaluatoristheindividualwhoisresponsiblefor
supervisingtheemployee.
Identifiedadditionalpositionsorpersonswhoprovideinputtowardthe
evaluation,ifany.
Descriptionoftrainingprograms:
Processestoensurethatallemployeessubjecttoanevaluationsystemare
informedonevaluationcriteria,datasources,methodologies,and
proceduresassociatedwiththeevaluationbeforetheevaluationtakesplace.
Processestoensurethatallindividualswithevaluationresponsibilitiesand
thosewhoprovideinputtowardevaluationunderstandtheproperuseof
theevaluationcriteriaandprocedures.
Documented:
Processesforprovidingtimelyfeedbacktotheindividualbeingevaluated.
Descriptionofhowresultsfromtheevaluationsystemwillbeusedfor
professionaldevelopment.
Requirementforparticipationinspecificprofessionaldevelopmentprograms
bythosewhohavebeenevaluatedaslessthaneffective.
Allinstructionalpersonnelmustbeevaluatedatleastonceayear.
Allclassroomteachersmustbeobservedandevaluatedatleastoncea
year.
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page59
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
Newlyhiredclassroomteachersareobservedandevaluatedatleast
twiceinthefirstyearofteachinginthedistrict.
Forinstructionalpersonnel:
Inclusionofopportunitiesforparentstoprovideinputintoperformance
evaluationswhenthedistrictdeterminessuchinputisappropriate.
Descriptionofthedistrict’scriteriaforinclusionofparentalinput.
Descriptionofmannerofinclusionofparentalinput.
Identificationoftheteachingfields,ifany,forwhichspecialevaluation
proceduresandcriteriaarenecessary.
Descriptionofthedistrict’speerassistanceprocess,ifany.
DistrictEvaluationProcedures
Thedistricthasprovidedandmeetsthefollowingcriteria:
Thatitsevaluationprocedurescomplywiths.1012.34(3)(c),F.S.,including:
Thattheevaluatormustsubmitawrittenreportoftheevaluationtothe
districtschoolsuperintendentforthepurposeofreviewingthe
employee’scontract.
Thattheevaluatormustsubmitthewrittenreporttotheemployeeno
laterthan10daysaftertheevaluationtakesplace.
Thattheevaluatormustdiscussthewrittenevaluationreportwiththe
employee.
Thattheemployeeshallhavetherighttoinitiateawrittenresponseto
theevaluationandtheresponseshallbecomeapermanentattachment
tohisorherpersonnelfile.
ThattheDistrict’sproceduresfornotificationofunsatisfactoryperformance
meettherequirementofs.1012.34(4),F.S.
Thatdistrictevaluationproceduresrequirethedistrictschoolsuperintendent
toannuallynotifytheDepartmentofanyinstructionalpersonnelwho
SchoolDistrictofManateeCounty Page60
InstructionalEvaluationSystemTemplate(IEST–2015)
receivestwoconsecutiveunsatisfactoryevaluationsandtonotifythe
Departmentofanyinstructionalpersonnelwhoaregivenwrittennoticeby
thedistrictofintenttoterminateornotrenew theiremployment,asoutlined
ins.1012.34,F.S.
DistrictSelfMonitoring
Thedistrictselfmonitoringincludesprocessestodeterminethefollowing:
Evaluators’understandingoftheproperuseofevaluationcriteriaand
procedures,includingevaluatoraccuracyandinterraterreliability.
Evaluatorsprov idenecessaryandtimelyfeedbacktoemployeesbeing
evaluated.
Evaluatorsfollowdistrictpoliciesandproceduresintheimplementation
of
evaluationsystem(s).
Theuseofevaluationdatatoidentifyindividualprofessionaldevelopment.
Theuseofevaluationdatatoinformschoolanddistrictimprovementplans.