ISSUE BRIEF
OCTOBER 6, 2015ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE | ISSUE BRIEF #404
HIGH QUALITY CHILD CARE IS
OUT OF REACH FOR
WORKING FAMILIES
BY ELISE GOULD AND TANYELL COOKE
Introduction and key findings
I
n recent decades most Americans have endured stagnant hourly pay, despite significant economy-wide income
growth (Bivens and Mishel 2015). In essence, only a fraction of overall economic growth is trickling down to typi-
cal households. There is no silver bullet for ensuring ordinary Americans share in the country’s prosperity; instead,
it will take a range of policies. Some should give workers more leverage in the labor market, and some should expand
social insurance and public investments to boost incomes. An obvious example of the latter is helping American families
cope with the high cost of child care.
The high cost of child care has received attention from an array of policymakers. For example, in his 2015 State of the
Union address, President Obama cited child care affordability as a key to helping middle-class families feel more secure
in a world of constant change (White House 2015). New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio recognized similar concerns
and released an interagency implementation plan for free, high-quality, full-day universal prekindergarten (NYC 2014).
High quality, dependable, and affordable child care for children of all ages is more important than ever, especially since
having both parents in the workforce is an economic necessity for many families.
This paper uses a number of benchmarks to gauge the affordability of child care across the country. It begins by explain-
ing how child care costs fit into EPI’s basic family budget thresholds, which measure the income families need in order
to attain a modest yet adequate standard of living in 618 communities. The report then compares child care costs to
state minimum wages and public college tuition. Finally, to determine how child care costs differ by location and family
composition, the paper reconstructs budgets for two-parent, two-child families in 10 locations to include the higher
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
BESbswy???????
ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE • 1333 H STREET, NW • SUITE 300, EAST TOWER • WASHINGTON, DC 20005 • 202.775.8810 • WWW.EPI.ORG
cost of infant care, compares these families child care costs to those of families without infants, and compares costs for
both family types with metro area median incomes.
Key findings include:
Child care costs account for a significant portion of family budgets.
EPI’s basic family budget threshold for a two-parent, two-child family ranges from $49,114 (Morristown,
Tennessee) to $106,493 (Washington, D.C.). In the median family budget area for this family type (Des
Moines, Iowa), a two-parent, two-child family needs $63,741 to attain a modest yet adequate standard of
living.
Across regions and family types, child care costs account for the greatest variability in family budgets.
Monthly child care costs for a household with one child (a 4-year-old) range from $344 in rural South Car-
olina to $1,472 in Washington, D.C.
As a share of total family budgets, center-based child care for single-parent families with two children (ages
4 and 8) ranges from 11.7 percent in New Orleans to 33.7 percent in Buffalo, New York.
Among families with two children (a 4-year-old and an 8-year-old), child care costs exceed rent in 500 out
of 618 family budget areas. For two-child families, child care costs range from about half as much as rent
in San Francisco to nearly three times rent in Binghamton, New York.
Child care is particularly unaffordable for minimum-wage workers.
The high cost of child care means that a full-time, full-year minimum-wage worker with one child falls far
below the family budget threshold in all 618 family budget areas—even after adjusting for higher state and
city minimum wages.
Among families with young children, child care costs constitute a large share of annual earnings for families
living off one full-time, full-year minimum-wage income. For example, to meet the demands of infant
care costs for a year, a minimum-wage worker in Hawaii—the state with the median state minimum wage
($7.75)—would have to devote his or her entire earnings from working full time (40 hours a week) from
January until September.
Other salient benchmarks highlight the extremely high costs of child care.
In 33 states and the District of Columbia, infant care costs exceed the average cost of in-state college tuition
at public 4-year institutions.
In terms of child care costs’ share of total family budgets, only in a handful of EPI’s 618 family budget areas
are child care costs close to the 10 percent affordability threshold established by the Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
Child care costs are particularly high for younger children. When 10 family budgets in various areas are
reconstructed to include two-parent, two-child families with an infant and a 4-year-old (instead of a 4-year-
old and an 8-year-old), child care ranges from 19.3 percent to 28.7 percent of total family budgets. This
compares with a range of 11.8 percent to 21.6 percent for families with a 4-year-old and an 8-year-old.
EPI ISSUE BRIEF #404 | OCTOBER 6, 2015
PAGE 2
In these 10 areas, child care costs for an infant and a 4-year-old constitute between approximately 20 per-
cent and 31 percent of median family income—far above the HHS’s 10 percent affordability standard.
Child care costs and EPI’s basic family budgets
Perhaps the best way to evaluate the affordability of child care is to determine the share of a familys budget accounted
for by child care costs. Toward this end, this paper relies upon EPI’s Family Budget Calculator (Gould, Cooke, and
Kimball 2015), which measures the income families need in order to attain a modest yet adequate living standard where
they live by estimating community-specific costs of housing, food, child care, transportation, health care, other necessi-
ties, and taxes, for 10 family types living in 618 U.S. communities.
Background on EPI’s basic family budgets
EPI’s basic family budgets differ by location, since certain costs, such as housing, vary significantly depending on where
one resides. Geographical cost-of-living differences are built into the budget calculations by incorporating regional,
state, or local variations in prices (depending on item). Basic family budget measurements are also adjustable by family
type because expenses vary considerably depending on the number of children in a family (if any), and whether a family
is headed by a single parent or two parents. The 10 family types include one or two adults with zero to four children.
To estimate family costs, we assume one-child families have a 4-year-old, and that a second child is 8 years old, a third
12 years old, and a fourth 16 years old. (For more on the methodology used to construct the budgets, see Gould et al.
2015.)
The shares of expenses going to various categories vary substantially across areas and family types. Unsurprisingly, the
lowest family budgets are for a single person. Except for child care (in which case families composed of two adults
with no children also spend nothing), one-person families have the lowest expenses in every category. For example, they
require only efficiency housing and only need to purchase other items, such as food and health care, for one. Budgets
rise significantly with family size, since more children require more housing, food, health care, and child care.
What it takes to get by varies greatly across the country, as displayed in Figure A. For a two-parent, two-child family,
the family budget threshold ranges from $49,114 (in Morristown, Tennessee) to $106,493 (in Washington, D.C.). In
the median family budget area for this family type—Des Moines, Iowa—a two-parent, two-child family needs $63,741
to attain a modest yet adequate standard of living.
How child care costs fit into EPI’s basic family budgets
Child care costs are one of the most significant expenses in a familys budget, largely because child care and early edu-
cation is a labor-intensive industry, requiring a low student-to-teacher ratio (CCAA 2014). Across regions and family
types, child care costs account for the greatest variability in family budgets. Monthly child care costs for a household
with one child (a 4-year-old) range from $344 in rural South Carolina to $1,472 in Washington, D.C.
In EPI’s family budgets, child care costs in metropolitan areas—which constitute over 90 percent of our family budget
areas—are statewide averages of the cost of center-based care. (For rural areas, which may not have easy access to center-
based care, the budgets assume family-based care.) Although center-based care varies in quality, it serves as the standard
EPI ISSUE BRIEF #404 | OCTOBER 6, 2015
PAGE 3
FIGURE A
Annual income necessary to secure a modest yet adequate
standard of living for a two-parent, two-child family, 2014
Note: Data for all 10 family budget types in all 618 family budget areas are available via EPI’s Family Budget Calculator.
Source: EPI Family Budget Calculator (Gould, Cooke, and Kimball 2015)
for child care costs in the vast majority of our budget areas because it is the predominant form of child care (CCAA
2014).
However, center-based care is out of reach for many working families. Costs are particularly high for families with
infants due to increased staff sizes and additional training and licensing requirements (CCAA 2014); center-based infant
care costs range from $468 a month in Mississippi to $1,868 a month in the District of Columbia. Child care costs are
even higher for families with multiple children; in the District of Columbia, monthly child care costs for a three-child
household (with a 4-year-old, an 8-year-old, and a 12-year-old) are $2,784—nearly 90 percent higher than for a house-
hold with one child (a 4-year-old).
As a share of total family budgets, center-based child care for single-parent families with two children (ages 4 and 8)
ranges from 11.7 percent in New Orleans to 33.7 percent in Buffalo, New York. When comparing child care costs with
other budget components, the high expense of child care becomes even more evident. In fact, among one-child families
with a 4-year-old, child care expenses exceed housing expenses in 90 of 618 family budget areas. Among two-child fam-
EPI ISSUE BRIEF #404 | OCTOBER 6, 2015
PAGE 4
ilies with a 4-year-old and an 8-year-old, child care costs exceed rent in 500 of 618 family budget areas. For two-child
families, child care costs range from about half as much as housing costs in San Francisco to nearly three times housing
costs in Binghamton, New York.
Affording child care on the minimum wage
Affording child care is particularly difficult for families living off a minimum-wage income. By a wide range of measures,
the current federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour is well below the historical peak reached in 1968, with profound
implications for the standard of living of workers at or near the minimum wage (Cooper, Schmitt, and Mishel 2015).
Even in the best of economic times, many parents in low-wage jobs will not earn enough through work to meet basic
family needs. Indeed, annual wages total just $15,080 for a full-time, full-year worker (i.e., one who works 40 hours
per week, 52 weeks per year) paid the federal minimum wage. Even after adjusting for higher state and city minimum
wages, a full-time, full-year minimum-wage worker is paid less than is necessary for one adult to meet his local family
budget threshold—and far below what is required for an adult with even just one child to make ends meet anywhere.
In fact, a large share of annual earnings from a full-time, full-year minimum-wage job must be devoted to child care.
The shares of annual minimum-wage earnings required to afford 4-year-old care costs in each state are depicted in Fig-
ure B; Figure C depicts these shares for infant care costs.
In Hawaii, the state with the median state minimum wage ($7.75), annual costs for 4-year-old care are equal to 55.8
percent of minimum-wage earnings. This means a minimum-wage worker would have to work 1,162 hours—or full
time (40 hours a week) from January until July—to cover annual child care costs for a 4-year-old. In comparison, annual
infant care costs in Hawaii are equal to 74.4 percent of minimum-wage earnings. In other words, to pay for infant care
for a year, a minimum-wage worker in the state would have to work 1,548 hours, or from January until September.
Of course, in families with more than one child, these expenses are even higher. In two-child families, with an infant
and a 4-year-old, child care expenditures as a share of full-time, full-year minimum-wage earnings range from 62.9 per-
cent in South Dakota to 183.5 percent in Washington, D.C. (not shown).
Child care costs exceed college tuition in many states
High and rising college tuition is a well-known phenomenon; while hourly wages have stagnated, college tuition has
grown faster than both overall inflation and median incomes, making college increasingly unaffordable (Barrett 2015).
What is less well known is how comparable college tuition is to child care costs.
As with child care costs, postsecondary education costs vary greatly by institution type and state. The average annual
cost of tuition for an in-state full-time undergraduate student in a degree-granting public institution ranges from $3,756
in Wyoming to $14,469 in New Hampshire (NCES 2014). While these sums are sizable, 4-year-old care exceeds the
average cost of in-state college tuition at public 4-year institutions in 24 states and the District of Columbia (as shown
in Figure D). Similarly, infant care costs exceed tuition in 33 states and the District of Columbia (as shown in Figure
E). Even when looking at out-of-state tuition at public 4-year institutions, which is significantly more expensive than
in-state tuition, college costs still do not dwarf child care costs.
EPI ISSUE BRIEF #404 | OCTOBER 6, 2015
PAGE 5
FIGURE B
Annual child care costs for a 4-year-old as a share of full-time,
full-year minimum-wage earnings, by state
Note: Earnings are calculated using state minimum wages and assuming the parent works 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year.
Source: EPI analysis of EPI Family Budget Calculator (Gould, Cooke, and Kimball 2015) and Minimum Wage Tracker (EPI 2015)
State
Share of
earnings
needed
to afford
child
care
Alabama 39.7%
Alaska 46.5%
Arizona 44.7%
Arkansas 32.4%
California 44.2%
Colorado 58.9%
Connecticut 59.0%
Delaware 42.9%
Washington
D.C.
80.9%
Florida 40.5%
Georgia 40.3%
Hawaii 55.8%
Idaho 43.2%
Illinois 55.3%
Indiana 43.7%
Iowa 53.5%
Kansas 51.6%
Kentucky 40.4%
Louisiana 33.1%
Maine 54.5%
Maryland 56.5%
Massachusetts 67.2%
Michigan 47.9%
Minnesota 59.0%
Mississippi 32.5%
Missouri 39.0%
Montana 47.6%
Nebraska 47.9%
Nevada 48.8%
New
Hampshire
65.2%
New Jersey 55.9%
New Mexico 45.0%
New York 68.9%
North
Carolina
50.6%
North Dakota 48.4%
Ohio 39.3%
Oklahoma 39.0%
Oregon 45.7%
Pennsylvania 59.1%
Rhode Island 56.7%
South
Carolina
36.5%
South Dakota 30.7%
Tennessee 30.6%
Texas 45.0%
Utah 41.4%
Vermont 54.0%
Virginia 52.1%
Washington 48.2%
West Virginia 41.5%
Wisconsin 63.0%
Wyoming 53.6%
Is child care affordable?
Another benchmark against which to measure child care costs is the Department of Health and Human Services’s official
affordability threshold of 10 percent or less of a familys income (HHS 2014). In only a handful of EPI’s 618 family
budget areas (all in Louisiana) are child care costs close to 10 percent of the income required for a family with two
parents and two children (a 4-year-old and an 8-year-old) to attain a modest yet adequate living standard.
As mentioned previously, child care is even less affordable for families with infants. To illustrate this, we reconstructed
family budgets in 10 areas for two-parent, two-child families with an infant and a 4-year-old (instead of a 4-year-old
EPI ISSUE BRIEF #404 | OCTOBER 6, 2015
PAGE 6
FIGURE C
Annual infant care costs as a share of full-time, full-year
minimum-wage earnings, by state
Note: Earnings are calculated using state minimum wages and assuming the parent works 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year.
Source: EPI analysis of EPI Family Budget Calculator (Gould, Cooke, and Kimball 2015) and Minimum Wage Tracker (EPI 2015)
State
Share of
earnings
needed
to afford
infant
care
Alabama 37.6%
Alaska 57.7%
Arizona 55.9%
Arkansas 38.8%
California 63.4%
Colorado 78.4%
Connecticut 71.0%
Delaware 53.9%
Washington
D.C.
102.6%
Florida 51.1%
Georgia 47.6%
Hawaii 74.4%
Idaho 43.9%
Illinois 74.8%
Indiana 56.1%
Iowa 62.2%
Kansas 73.0%
Kentucky 41.9%
Louisiana 38.3%
Maine 61.3%
Maryland 82.7%
Massachusetts 90.3%
Michigan 58.6%
Minnesota 76.3%
Mississippi 37.2%
Missouri 56.1%
Montana 54.0%
Nebraska 55.8%
Nevada 60.1%
New
Hampshire
80.6%
New Jersey 67.6%
New Mexico 49.2%
New York 81.4%
North
Carolina
61.7%
North Dakota 53.3%
Ohio 47.1%
Oklahoma 52.4%
Oregon 58.8%
Pennsylvania 70.9%
Rhode Island 69.1%
South
Carolina
43.1%
South Dakota 32.2%
Tennessee 39.7%
Texas 58.4%
Utah 54.5%
Vermont 54.2%
Virginia 67.9%
Washington 63.9%
West Virginia 47.9%
Wisconsin 76.8%
Wyoming 62.5%
and an 8-year-old). To account for population differences and geographic variations in the cost of individual compo-
nents, we reconstructed budgets for a range of areas, including San Francisco; Stamford, Connecticut; Tampa, Florida;
Atlanta; Chicago; Boston; Detroit; Kansas City, Missouri; Raleigh, North Carolina; and Las Vegas.
Costs greatly increase when substituting an infant for an 8-year-old in EPI’s basic family budgets, as shown in Figure
F. While infants require a smaller food budget than 8-year-olds, infant care costs greatly exceed child care costs for
an 8-year-old. Annual budgets for two-parent families with an infant and a 4-year-old range from $67,536 in Atlanta
(which saw the smallest change in its overall budget, increasing $3,648) to $108,245 in Stamford. (Boston saw the
largest change in its overall budget, increasing $16,921.) Annual child care costs for an infant and a 4-year-old range
EPI ISSUE BRIEF #404 | OCTOBER 6, 2015
PAGE 7
FIGURE D
Four-year-old child care costs as a share of full-time, in-state
public college tuition, by state, 2014
Source: EPI analysis of NCES (2014) and EPI Family Budget Calculator (Gould, Cooke, and Kimball 2015)
State
Child
care
costs
as
share
of
tuition
Alabama 70.5%
Alaska 137.7%
Arizona 75.6%
Arkansas 73.2%
California 92.9%
Colorado 122.5%
Connecticut 111.0%
Delaware 65.3%
Washington
D.C.
243.5%
Florida 153.5%
Georgia 91.8%
Hawaii 109.6%
Idaho 103.2%
Illinois 75.9%
Indiana 78.0%
Iowa 103.0%
Kansas 105.3%
Kentucky 70.0%
Louisiana 75.5%
Maine 90.7%
Maryland 116.5%
Massachusetts 117.5%
Michigan 71.9%
Minnesota 106.6%
Mississippi 74.1%
Missouri 77.5%
Montana 126.0%
Nebraska 112.5%
Nevada 166.7%
New
Hampshire
67.9%
New Jersey 79.5%
New Mexico 117.4%
New York 181.9%
North
Carolina
116.0%
North Dakota 106.9%
Ohio 70.1%
Oklahoma 97.3%
Oregon 102.1%
Pennsylvania 70.7%
Rhode Island 98.3%
South
Carolina
49.7%
South Dakota 70.2%
Tennessee 57.9%
Texas 90.7%
Utah 110.3%
Vermont 73.7%
Virginia 74.6%
Washington 108.4%
West Virginia 115.1%
Wisconsin 113.0%
Wyoming 215.1%
from $13,245 in Atlanta to $29,478 in Boston. As a share of total family budgets, these child care costs range from 19.3
percent in San Francisco to 28.7 percent in Boston. This compares with a range of 11.8 percent in San Francisco to
21.6 percent in Chicago for families with a 4-year-old and an 8-year-old.
We next measure these child care costs against what families actually earn. Specifically, as shown in Figure G, we com-
pare median incomes in these 10 areas to child care costs both for two-child families with an infant and a 4-year-old,
and for families with a 4-year-old and an 8-year-old. Even in Atlanta—the area in our case study with the lowest child
care costs—child care costs for an infant and a 4-year-old equal nearly 20 percent of median family income, almost
EPI ISSUE BRIEF #404 | OCTOBER 6, 2015
PAGE 8
FIGURE E
Infant care costs as a share of full-time, in-state public college
tuition, by state, 2014
Source: EPI analysis of NCES (2014) and EPI Family Budget Calculator (Gould, Cooke, and Kimball 2015)
State
Infant
care
costs
as
share
of
tuition
Alabama 66.6%
Alaska 170.9%
Arizona 94.5%
Arkansas 87.9%
California 133.4%
Colorado 163.1%
Connecticut 133.5%
Delaware 82.0%
Washington
D.C.
308.9%
Florida 193.4%
Georgia 108.5%
Hawaii 146.0%
Idaho 104.8%
Illinois 102.5%
Indiana 100.2%
Iowa 119.6%
Kansas 149.1%
Kentucky 72.6%
Louisiana 87.7%
Maine 102.0%
Maryland 170.6%
Massachusetts 157.9%
Michigan 87.9%
Minnesota 138.0%
Mississippi 84.9%
Missouri 111.5%
Montana 143.1%
Nebraska 131.2%
Nevada 205.0%
New
Hampshire
84.0%
New Jersey 96.0%
New Mexico 128.6%
New York 215.0%
North
Carolina
141.4%
North Dakota 117.8%
Ohio 84.0%
Oklahoma 130.8%
Oregon 131.3%
Pennsylvania 84.8%
Rhode Island 119.6%
South
Carolina
58.8%
South Dakota 73.5%
Tennessee 75.2%
Texas 117.7%
Utah 145.4%
Vermont 73.9%
Virginia 97.2%
Washington 143.6%
West Virginia 132.8%
Wisconsin 137.8%
Wyoming 251.0%
double the HHS affordability standard. This share increases in places with more expensive child care, peaking in Boston
at over 31 percent for an infant and a 4-year-old—over three times the affordability standard. However, lower child care
costs do not necessarily equal affordability. For example, in Las Vegas—which had middle-of-the-pack child care costs
in our case study—child care costs for an infant and a 4-year-old equal 30.3 percent of median family income, because
the areas median income is relatively low. This provides further evidence that child care is unaffordable for many fam-
ilies. Moreover, half of families actually earn less than the median, suggesting that far more families cannot afford child
care than the data imply.
EPI ISSUE BRIEF #404 | OCTOBER 6, 2015
PAGE 9
FIGURE F
Child care costs as a share of family budgets for two-parent,
two-child families in select metro areas, by age of children, 2014
Note: Family budgets are the amount required for two-parent, two-child families to secure a modest yet adequate standard of living.
Source: EPI analysis of EPI Family Budget Calculator (Gould, Cooke, and Kimball 2015)
AREANAME
Child care
(infant and
4-year-old)
Remaining
budget
items
(family with
infant and
4-year-old)
Child
care (4-year-old
and 8-year-old)
Remaining
budget
items (family
with
4-year-old
and
8-year-old)
Atlanta $13,245.4538 $54,290.2557 $9,733.2800 $54,155.0415
Boston $29,477.5275 $73,235.6709 $16,065.6558 $69,727.0111
Chicago $22,328.9540 $57,515.6416 $15,532.6526 $56,462.4977
Detroit $18,052.6754 $52,841.0035 $12,350.9707 $52,119.7063
Kansas City,
Mo.
$15,122.1789 $53,783.6177 $9,783.9783 $53,120.5079
Las Vegas $18,688.8076 $55,310.7543 $13,365.9231 $54,923.4359
Raleigh,
N.C.
$16,927.4464 $55,833.2475 $11,447.3158 $55,022.7049
San
Francisco
$20,142.8240 $84,169.7408 $10,815.2680 $80,969.6668
Stamford,
Conn.
$24,758.1007 $83,486.9431 $16,825.3386 $80,524.6349
Tampa, Fla. $15,339.6687 $53,544.3440 $10,658.0218 $53,308.3616
Conclusion
As policymakers look for ways to improve living standards for the vast majority of Americans who have endured decades
of stagnant wages, increasing child care affordability is an excellent place to start. Child care costs constitute a large
portion of the income families need in order to achieve a modest yet adequate standard of living—and are particularly
EPI ISSUE BRIEF #404 | OCTOBER 6, 2015
PAGE 10
FIGURE G
Child care costs as a share of median family income in select
metro areas, by age of children, 2014
Source: EPI analysis of U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2011–2013), EPI Family Budget Calculator (Gould, Cooke,
and Kimball 2015), and HHS (2014)
AREANAME
10% HHS
affordability
standard
4-year-old
and
8-year-old
Infant and
4-year-old
Atlanta 10% 14.40% 19.60%
Boston 17.00% 31.20%
Chicago 20.20% 29.00%
Detroit 18.50% 27.00%
Kansas City,
Mo.
14.70% 22.70%
Las Vegas 21.70% 30.30%
Raleigh,
N.C.
14.70% 21.70%
San
Francisco
11.20% 20.90%
Stamford,
Conn.
15.90% 23.40%
Tampa, Fla. 10% 18.20% 26.20%
onerous for workers paid the minimum wage. Measuring child care costs against a variety of benchmarks—including
the cost of college tuition, the HHS’s 10 percent affordability threshold, and median family incomes—demonstrates
that high quality child care is out of reach for working families.
Every week in the United States, nearly 11 million children younger than age 5 are in some type of child care arrange-
ment. On average, these children spend 36 hours a week in child care, with costs ranging upwards of $500 a month for
EPI ISSUE BRIEF #404 | OCTOBER 6, 2015
PAGE 11
an infant (CCAA 2014). As child care consumes a larger proportion of family budgets, funding high-quality child care
services should be a paramount concern for governments, business leaders, and families alike.
About the authors
Elise Gould, senior economist, joined EPI in 2003 and is the institutes director of health policy research. Her research
areas include wages, poverty, economic mobility, and health care. She is a co-author of The State of Working America,
12th Edition. In the past, she has authored a chapter on health in The State of Working America 2008/09; co-authored a
book on health insurance coverage in retirement; published in venues such as The Chronicle of Higher Education, Chal-
lenge Magazine, and Tax Notes; and written for academic journals including Health Economics, Health Affairs, Journal of
Aging and Social Policy, Risk Management & Insurance Review, Environmental Health Perspectives, and International Jour-
nal of Health Services. She holds a master’s in public affairs from the University of Texas at Austin and a Ph.D. in eco-
nomics from the University of Wisconsin at Madison.
Tanyell Cooke joined EPI in 2014. As a research assistant, she supports the research of EPI’s economists on topics such
as wages, labor markets, inequality, education, race and ethnicity, and immigration. She holds a B.A. in economics and
statistics from The George Washington University.
References
Barrett, Jennifer. 2015. “What’s the Value of a College Education? It Depends.CNBC.com, June 19.
Bivens, Josh, and Lawrence Mishel. 2015. Understanding the Historic Divergence Between Productivity and a Typical Worker’s Pay:
Why It Matters and Why It’s Real. Economic Policy Institute, Briefing Paper No. 406.
Bivens, Josh, Elise Gould, Lawrence Mishel, and Heidi Shierholz. 2014. Raising Americas Pay: Why Its Our Central Economic Policy
Challenge. Economic Policy Institute, Briefing Paper No. 378.
Child Care Aware of America (CCAA). 2014. Parents and the High Cost of Child Care: 2014 Report.
Cooper, David, John Schmitt, and Lawrence Mishel. 2015. We Can Afford a $12.00 Federal Minimum Wage in 2020. Economic
Policy Institute, Briefing Paper No. 398.
Economic Policy Institute (EPI). 2015. “Minimum Wage Tracker” (last updated September 15).
Gould, Elise, Tanyell Cooke, and Will Kimball. 2015. “Family Budget Calculator.” Economic Policy Institute.
Gould, Elise, Tanyell Cooke, Alyssa Davis, and Will Kimball. 2015. Economic Policy Institute 2015 Family Budget Calculator:
Technical Documentation. Economic Policy Institute, Working Paper No. 299.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2014. Digest of Education Statistics, Table B330.20: Average Undergraduate
Tuition and Fees and Room and Board Rates Charged for Full-Time Students in Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions, by
Control and Level of Institutions and State of Jurisdiction: 2012–13 and 2013–14.
Office of the Mayor of New York City (NYC). 2014. “City Releases Implementation Plan for Free, High Quality, Full-Day
Universal Pre-Kindergarten,” January 27.
Office of the White House Press Secretary (White House). 2015. “State of the Union Address.” January 20.
EPI ISSUE BRIEF #404 | OCTOBER 6, 2015
PAGE 12
U.S. Census Bureau, various years. American Community Survey (2009-2013), “Table B19113: Median Family Income in the Past
12 Months (In 2013 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars).
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 2014. Fun”damentals of CCDF Administration.
EPI ISSUE BRIEF #404 | OCTOBER 6, 2015
PAGE 13