November 2020
Pay Equity in the State Sector: Tools and Resources
Template | Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement
(Terms of Reference)
Te Kawa Mataaho Public Service Commission | Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement
2
Contents
Purpose 3
Introduction to this Bargaining Process Agreement 3
Structure of tools and resources 3
Pay equity process 4
Supporting notes for the Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement 5
Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement template 7
Parties 7
Background 7
Purpose 7
Scope 7
How we will work together 7
Process 8
Pay Equity Bargaining Process 8
Assessment 8
Settling the pay equity claim 9
Outcomes 9
Communication 10
Information 10
Dispute resolution 10
Authority 10
Union process for proposed settlement employees to vote 11
Bargaining teams 11
Other logistical arrangements 11
Signatories 11
These tools and resources do not constitute legal advice. Parties must seek their own legal
advice in respect of this template and how it applies to the pay equity claim being raised.
Email pay.equity@publicservice.govt.nz
if you would like a Word version of this document.
Te Kawa Mataaho Public Service Commission | Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement
3
Purpose
The purpose of this Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement (Bargaining Process Agreement)
template is to support parties to establish the good faith bargaining process they will use to address
the pay equity claim. A joint Bargaining Process Agreement is the frame for the parties’ working
relationship and will facilitate the effective and efficient assessment and resolution of the claimant’s
pay equity claim.
Introduction to this Bargaining Process Agreement
The Equal Pay Act 1972 Equal Pay Act 1972 (the Act, section 13C) sets out the requirements for good
faith in the pay equity bargaining process, requiring the parties, to at least:
follow the process set out in sections 13C and 13ZC to 13ZZE of the Act to resolve the claim
use their best endeavours to enter into an arrangement that sets out a process of conducting
the bargaining in an effective and efficient manner
use their best endeavours to settle the claim in an orderly, timely and efficient manner
recognise the role and authority of each party’s representatives
not undermine or do anything likely to undermine the bargaining or authority of another
party in the bargaining.
This Bargaining Process Agreement template is intended for use by parties after the employer has
accepted that a pay equity claim is arguable, and would be an arrangement that sets out a process for
conducting the pay equity bargaining in an effective and efficient manner, under section 13C(2)(d) of
the Act.
Structure of tools and resources
This guide is a part of a suite of tools and resources developed by Te Kawa Mataaho Public Service
Commission (the Commission). The structure of the tools and resources is set out in the pay equity
arrow diagram below to help users navigate and find the components that they need.
The tools and resources are designed to enable the parties to pay equity claims in the State sector to
progress claims consistently with the Act which is informed by the Pay Equity Principles
, and
ultimately to achieve pay equity. The tools and resources support the parties throughout the process,
from raising a claim to pay equity negotiations/settlement.
The process that is used to put the tools and resources into practice is just as important as the tools
themselves. It is the process used between the parties that will determine the robustness, internal
integrity, and validity of the outcomes.
Te Kawa Mataaho Public Service Commission | Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement
4
Pay equity process
The arrow diagram was developed to demonstrate the steps involved when working through the pay
equity process
.
The pay equity arrow diagram does not describe a linear process where one step must be completed
before another is started.
Based on the experience of parties to date, the process is flexible enough for some steps to be done in
parallel or slightly overlapping as appropriate. The main underpinning is for the parties to work
together through a process of engagement.
Te Kawa Mataaho Public Service Commission | Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement
5
Supporting notes for the Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement
Note 1: Parties
If new parties join the claim through consolidation, the Bargaining Process Agreement may be varied to
include a new employer and new union as parties to the Bargaining Process Agreement. The names of the
new employer/s and union/s should be inserted in the sentence below as a variation. From here on
throughout this Bargaining Process Agreement the term parties is used to describe those employer/s and
employees/union/s listed in the sentence below. If there is a need to agree new terms for the multi-
employer situation a new Bargaining Process Agreement to replace the first one and covering the new
parties joining the claim could be agreed.
Note 2: Claim is arguable
The Bargaining Process Agreement may refer to any earlier documents that support the statement that
the pay equity claim is arguable. For example, any dated correspondence from the employer or between
the parties that confirms that they have accepted that the claim is arguable. This Bargaining Process
Agreement specifies a pay equity bargaining process, in accordance with sections 13ZC 13ZZE of the Act
that the parties will use.
Note 3: Background
Include a short history of how the parties reached this point and relevant contextual information.
(For example see the background section in the 2019-03-18-ToR-Midwives-pay-equity-claim-for-MERAS-and-
NZNO-final.pdf)
Note 4: Scope
The Act requires the claimants to include a brief description of the work performed by the employees to
be covered by the claim. The Act refers to the “work performed”. This means that the scope of a claim
may be wider or narrower than, for example, the coverage of the relevant collective agreement or union
membership.
The Act provides that multiple union-raised pay equity claims in respect of the same work performed
within the same employer, must be consolidated as a single joint claim (section 13M of the Act).
Additionally, if one or more unions raise a claim with one or more employers in respect of the same work
that is covered by an existing claim, then unions must consolidate the claims (section 13N(3)).
Employers may agree to consolidate union-raised claims made in respect of the same work performed
across multiple employers. Section 13K sets out the process required to consolidate claims across
multiple employers and section 13L prescribes the process for opting out of a multi-employer pay equity
claim.
There are different information requirements for claims raised by union/s and claims raised by an
individual employee. When an individual employee raises a claim they must state their occupation,
position and a brief description of work, while a union or unions must state a brief description of the
work. For this reason, when describing the claim coverage this template provides the options
[occupation/position/description of work]. Please select the options that best suit the Pay Equity Claim to
which this Bargaining Process Agreement relates.
Note 5: How we will work together
The Act seeks to improve the process for raising and progressing pay equity claims, building on the good
faith requirements in section 4 of the Employment Relations Act 2000. This section of the Bargaining
Process Agreement, therefore outlines principles and expectations to underpin the good faith pay equity
bargaining process that the parties mutually commit to and complies with section 13C(2) of the Act.
Te Kawa Mataaho Public Service Commission | Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement
6
Note 6: Pay Equity Bargaining Process (assessment and settling the pay equity claim)
The Act prescribes:
that the assessment of the work and remuneration of the claimants and comparators must be
objective and without assumptions based on sex; and recognise the importance of skills,
responsibilities, effort, and conditions of work that are, or have been, commonly overlooked or
undervalued in female-dominated work (section13ZD)
that the parties may also consider whether the claimant(s)’ work is currently undervalued using
the factors listed at section 13F(3)
criteria for selecting appropriate comparators (section 13ZE)
in the event that this Bargaining Process Agreement covers consolidation of a claim then this
Bargaining Process Agreement can be varied to include the additional party/parties (see Note 2).
Note 7: Outcomes
This section is optional but may be useful.
Note 8: Information
The sharing of information is important to assess pay equity claims. The Bargaining Process Agreement
template suggests text about the proactive sharing of information is therefore suggested, consistent with
the good faith bargaining approach in the Act.
The Act provides for a duty to provide information on request, including the possible use of an
independent reviewer to protect the confidentiality of information (section 13ZC of the Act).
Note 9: Other logistical arrangements
This section is optional. Parties may wish to agree and record responsibility for arrangements and costs
associated with travel, accommodation, and meals.
NB: If parties would like to see previous examples of Bargaining Process Agreement for claims these may
be published on employer and union websites or parties could contact the Taskforce for examples by
emailing [email protected]ovt.nz
Te Kawa Mataaho Public Service Commission | Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement
7
Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement template
Parties
The parties to this Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement are the [insert union or employee] and
the [insert employer(s)].
The [parties] agree the pay equity claim is arguable.
Background
[insert short history of how the parties reached this point and relevant contextual information]
Purpose
The purpose of this Bargaining Process Agreement is to facilitate the effective and efficient
assessment and resolution of the claimant’s pay equity claim in respect of [insert occupation
/position/description of work]. This Bargaining Process Agreement establishes the good faith
bargaining process by which the parties will address the pay equity claim.
Scope
The parties agree the pay equity claim is arguable for [insert occupation/position/description of work]
and those doing the same or substantially similar work.
The work performed is [briefly describe the work being performed]. The [insert employer(s)] confirms
that it has notified affected employees of the employer, that is, employees who perform work that is
the same as, or substantially similar to, the work performed by the claimants.
Parties agree that the scope of the claim may be affected by the outcome of the pay equity
investigations, that is the scope may shift to either include or exclude some roles.
Every employee who performs work that is the same or substantially similar to the work to which the
claim relates is covered by the claim, unless they opt out under section 13Y of the Act.
Other employees who perform the same or substantially similar work to which the claim relates, and
who are not covered by the union raised claim, must be offered the benefit of any pay equity
settlement.
How we will work together
The principles and expectations underpinning our engagement are:
bargaining in good faith to settle the pay equity claim, and
committing to an effective and efficient process, as soon as possible after the start of
bargaining, as set out in the Act, and
attending the necessary meetings and will meet as agreed to review progress; and
respecting the independence of each organisation including recognition of each other’s
specific roles and authority, and
committing to keeping our respective executive groups and other key stakeholders
informed, and
participating in timely and effective decision-making processes.
Te Kawa Mataaho Public Service Commission | Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement
8
Process
The parties commit to undertake this work as effectively and efficiently as possible. The following
process is to ensure that pay equity bargaining is conducted effectively and efficiently.
The pay equity process is not a linear process where one step must be completed before another is
started. The process is flexible enough so that some steps can be carried out in parallel or slightly
overlapping as appropriate.
Pay Equity Bargaining Process
Assessment
1. Parties to a pay equity claim must determine whether the employee’s work is undervalued by
assessing:
a) The nature of the work to which the claim relates, and the nature of comparators, including,
in each case, the following:
skills required
responsibilities imposed
conditions of work
degree of effort required to perform the work
level of experience required to perform the work
any other relevant work features [briefly describe the methodology to be used for
assessment as well as for identifying potential comparators]; and
b) Terms and conditions of employment (other than remuneration) of the persons who
perform the work to which the claim relates [briefly describe the methodology to be used];
and
c) Terms and conditions of employment (other than remuneration) of persons who perform
comparable work [the methodology to be used is the same as that described in clause (b)
above]; and
d) The remuneration that is paid to the persons who perform the work to which the claim
relates [briefly describe the methodology to be used]; and
e) The remuneration that is paid to persons who perform comparable work [the methodology
to be used is the same as that described in clause (d) above]; and
f) Any other matters prescribed by regulations made under section 19 of the Act for the
purposes of section 13ZD Matters to be Assessed.
2. In making the assessment required above, the parties:
a) Must consider matters objectively and without assumptions based on sex (and prevailing
views as to the value of work must not be assumed to be free of assumptions based on sex);
and
b) Must recognise the importance of skills, responsibilities, effort and conditions that are or
have been commonly overlooked or undervalued in female-dominated work (for example,
social and communication skills, taking responsibility for the well-being of others, cultural
knowledge, and sensitivity); and
c) Must consider the list of factors in section 13F(3) of the Act.
Te Kawa Mataaho Public Service Commission | Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement
9
3. It is acknowledged that the individual parties may choose to select comparators, and agree the
proposed comparators, and use the information gathered regarding these comparators from
other current or completed pay equity processes where the parties consider this useful and
relevant
1
.
4. Where comparators have been chosen from other completed or current pay equity work, a
decision will be made as to whether additional interviews for these comparators is necessary or
not.
5. The assessment phase requires the parties to work collaboratively. In this phase there is a need
to balance the requirements to effectively and efficiently progress resolution of the claims with
requirements to ensure the necessary evidence is gathered to make robust, enduring, fair and
equitable assessments and decisions.
6. Parts of the work involved in the assessment phase may occur in parallel or overlap.
Settling the pay equity claim
7. Confirm the pay equity rate/s and which roles they apply to.
8. Negotiate an agreement to address the sex-based undervaluation and to deliver pay equity.
9. Negotiate and settle the process for reviewing and maintaining pay equity.
10. Any settlement should be recorded in writing and will need to be ratified (agreed to) by affected
employees.
11. A copy of the pay equity claim settlement is to be delivered to the Chief Executive of the Ministry
of Business, Innovation and Employment as soon as practicable after settlement is reached.
The information in the settlement may not be used by the Chief Executive for purposes other
than statistical or analytical purposes (section 13ZK of the Act).
Outcomes
We will know we have been successful when:
the value and recognition of work by [insert occupation/position/description of work] is free
from sex-based undervaluation
a negotiated agreement is reached that achieves pay equity for [insert occupation
/position/description of work] which has no element of sex-based undervaluation
there is a clear and agreed review mechanism for maintaining the value of the agreed pay
equity.
1
This is what’s required under 13ZE(1)(c) if parties choose a comparator that is not a male comparator.
Te Kawa Mataaho Public Service Commission | Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement
10
Communication
The parties recognise the importance of preserving the integrity of the process and agree to manage
communications while bargaining on a pay equity claim accordingly, and specifically as listed below:
during negotiation of the pay equity claim each party’s communications will comply with the
principles of good faith in the Act (section 13C) and the provisions of section 4 of the
Employment Relations Act 2000. Each party recognises the right of the other to
communicate with members or employees via normal channels of communication
at the end of each pay equity meeting, the parties may agree key messages for any internal
and external communications
approaches from the media regarding a pay equity claim may require either party to respond
within short timeframes. In this situation the parties will use best endeavours to maintain a
‘no surprises’ approach.
Information
The parties will supply each other with any relevant information to assess the pay equity claim or to
substantiate a position relevant to the bargaining. Parties will maintain the confidentiality of that
information and of the negotiations, unless otherwise agreed.
Parties confirm their commitment to contribute claims data and information to the central pay equity
claims data and information repository for use by parties to other claims processes for the purposes
of expediting future claims processes. Claims data and information may be contributed to the
repository during the claims process or at the end of the process.
Dispute resolution
Issues will be resolved, wherever possible, at the lowest possible level to where they arise. Either party
can notify the other and bring in senior staff if it considers this will assist the group’s progress.
In the event of a disagreement, the parties acknowledge that dispute resolution processes are
available, including mediation through the Employment Mediation Services of the Ministry of
Business, Innovation and Employment, or a mediator agreed by the parties. If mediation is
unsuccessful, either party may access dispute resolution through the Employment Relations
Authority.
Authority
The [name of employer] team has the authority to enter a proposed settlement agreement subject to
approval by the Chief Executive.
The union/representative team has the authority to enter into a proposed settlement agreement,
subject to endorsement by [insert relevant union/occupational group/description of work] according
to their endorsement/ratification process in accordance with section 13ZF of the Act.
Te Kawa Mataaho Public Service Commission | Pay Equity Bargaining Process Agreement
11
Union process for proposed settlement employees to vote
The process used by the [insert union name] to obtain a mandate from proposed settlement
employees (union and non-union employees covered by the union claim) will be in accordance with
section 13ZF of the Act.
Bargaining teams
Name Position
Parties commit to maintaining the consistency of membership of their bargaining teams as much as is
practicable, to support an effective and efficient bargaining process. Where a team must change their
membership, they will notify the other bargaining team as soon as reasonably possible.
Other logistical arrangements
[This section is optional so please delete if not required. Parties may wish to agree and record
responsibility for arrangements and costs associated with travel, accommodation, and meals]
Signatories
Claimant/union name Employer name
Claimant/union signature Employer signature
Date Date