Conversely, some contract cleaning companies
will often subcontract their cleaning jobs to other
companies. This not only provides less assurance of the
type of cleaners who will be attending to the building,
but also demonstrates a more transactional approach
to each customer. Instead of working directly with
a customer to build relationships and integrate into
the customer’s company culture, the subcontractor
will provide hired guns who have less of a long-term
approach to the job.
However, situations where it would be more efficient to
subcontract work out to specialized companies present
opportunities for better results. Small, specialized
jobs that are single-run or rarely run jobs like painting,
patching and power washing are very often better
left to specialists who can perform the work more
effectively while providing cost savings due to the
efficiency that their specialized knowledge affords
them.
Another cost to the customer can come in the form
of customer service. Since the subcontractor does
not report directly to the company who the customer
hired, the customer must now rely on a cleaning
team with whom they have no direct relationship.
With so many degrees of separation, it can become
difficult to ensure that the customer’s specific needs
are being met. A short-term approach may require
less in-depth preparation or intensive labor, but that
approach may not be sustainable in the long run. It
does, however, alleviate many of the costs associated
with a workforce: payroll taxes, worker’s compensation
and employee benefits. There are also other
opportunity costs, and not all of them can be measured
quantitatively.
In the long run, the best cost savings for a contract-
cleaning company can come not from hiring less-
qualified employees for a lower wage, but rather
hiring highly qualified individuals and investing in
a compensation and benefits package that ensures
that they stay in the position for the long term. Why
is that? Many companies have learned investing
in a comprehensive training program often leads
to a workforce that has low turnover and high
retention, which can end up saving money in the
long run. Additionally, the efficiency that comes
from a knowledgeable, highly experienced workforce
minimizes costly mistakes and the tendency to make
up for lack of quality with a higher quantity of workers.
Most importantly, successful companies ensure
that their prized team members understand how
appreciated they are. Again, going back to the
importance of company culture, successful contract
cleaning companies create a culture that not only
rewards employees financially, but also recognizes
and celebrates their achievements. A study by Bersin
and Associates on employee motivation shows that
when management recognizes and honors their
team members’ achievements, their company enjoys
a voluntary turnover rate that is 31% lower than
companies who do not recognize their team members’
achievements. Reinforcing financial incentives with
recognition not only more effectively empowers team
members, but it also motivates them to grow within
the company and continually try to reach new, higher
performance benchmarks.
On the other hand, high turnover within an organization
can lead to a lower quality of cleaning technician and
subsequently unsatisfactory results. These are often
the results of cost-cutting measures at the employee
level, which can become increasingly detrimental over