NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), Fourth Edition
PARTICULATES NOT OTHERWISE REGULATED, RESPIRABLE: METHOD 0600, Issue 3, dated 15 January 1998 - Page 4 of 6
Bias can also be caused in a cyclone by the pulsation of the personal sampling pump. Bartley, et
al. [12] showed that cyclone samples with pulsating ow can have negative bias as large as −0.22
relative to samples with steady ow. The magnitude of the bias depends on the amplitude of the
pulsation at the cyclone aperture and the dust size distribution. For pumps with instantaneous
ow rates within 20% of the mean, the pulsation bias magnitude is less than 0.02 for most dust size
distributions encountered in the workplace.
Electric charges on the dust and the cyclone will also cause bias. Briant and Moss [13] have found
electrostatic biases as large as −50%, and show that cyclones made with graphite-lled nylon
eliminate the problem. Use of conductive samplers and lter cassettes (Omega Specialty Instrument
Co., 4 Kidder Road, Chelmsford, MA 01824) is recommended.
2. Precision: The gure 0.068 mg quoted above for the precision is based on a study [3] of weighing
procedures employed in the past by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) in which
lters are pre-weighed by the lter manufacturer and post-weighed by MSHA using balances
readable to 0.010 mg. MSHA [14] has recently completed a study using a 0.001 mg balance for the
post-weighing, indicating imprecision equal to 0.006 mg.
Imprecision equal to 0.010 mg was used for estimating the LOD and is based on specic suggestions
[8] regarding lter weighing using a single 0.001 mg balance. This value is consistent with another
study [15] of repeat lter weighings, although the actual attainable precision may depend strongly
on the specic environment to which the lters are exposed between the two weighings.
REFERENCES:
[1] Bartley DL, Chen CC, Song R, Fischbach TJ [1994]. Respirable aerosol sampler performance testing.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J, 55(11): 1036–1046.
[2] Bowman JD, Bartley DL, Breuer GM, Shulman SA [1985]. The precision of coal mine dust sampling.
Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHEW (NIOSH) Pub. No.
85-220721.
[3] Parobeck P, Tomb TF, Ku H, Cameron J [1981]. Measurement assurance program for the weighings
of respirable coal mine dust samples. J Qual Tech 13:157.
[4] ACGIH [1996]. 1996 Threshold limit values (TLVs™) for chemical substances and physical agents
and biological exposure indices (BEIs™). Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental
Industrial Hygienists.
[5] American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists [1991]. Notice of intended change—
appendix D—particle size-selective sampling criteria for airborne particulate matter. Appl Occup
Env Hyg 6(9): 817–818.
[6] NIOSH [1977]. NIOSH Manual of sampling data sheets. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, DHEW (NIOSH) Publication No. 77-159.
[7] Higgins RI, Dewell P [1967]. A gravimetric size selecting personal dust sampler. In: Davies CN, Ed.
Inhaled particles and vapors II. Oxford: Pergammon Press, pp. 575–586.
[8] Bowman JD, Bartley DL, Breuer GM, Doemeny LJ, Murdock DJ [1984]. Accuracy criteria
recommended for the certication of gravimetric coal mine dust personal samplers. NTIS Pub. No.
PB 85-222446 (1984).
[9] Breslin, JA, Page SJ, Jankowski RA [1983]. Precision of personal sampling of respirable dust in coal
mines. U.S. Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations #8740.
[10] Bartley DL, Breuer GM [1982]. Analysis and optimization of the performance of the 10-mm cyclone.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 43: 520–528.
[11] Caplan KJ, Doemeny LJ, Sorenson S [1973]. Evaluation of coal mine dust personal sampler
performance, Final Report. NIOSH Contract No. PH CPE-r-70-0036.