VOL 63: APRIL • AVRIL 2017
|
Canadian Family Physician • Le Médecin de famille canadien
295
Praxis
An efcient tool for the primary
care management of menopause
Susan Goldstein MD CCFP FCFP NCMP
T
he Canadian population is aging. In 2014, women
aged 50 to 54 years comprised the largest age cohort
of women in Canada,
1
an age at which most women
begin the menopause transition. This might be accom-
panied by vasomotor symptoms (VMS), genitouri-
nary syndrome of menopause (GSM), mood and sleep
changes, joint pain, and more.
2
After the early termination of the Women’s Health
Initiative in 2002, menopausal hormone therapy (MHT)
became highly controversial because of reported
increases in the risk of breast cancer and cardiovascular
disease.
3
In response, interest in nonhormonal options
grew and many have been evaluated (eg, antidepressants,
gabapentin, pregabalin, clonidine, phytoestrogens). While
they were effective for mild VMS, these medications are
not particularly effective for moderate to severe VMS or
for some of the other menopause-related concerns.
4,5
New guidelines
Menopausal hormone therapy remains the most effec-
tive treatment of VMS, and is also indicated for GSM
(previously called vulvovaginal atrophy) and bone pro-
tection.
4,6,7
Recently, the Women’s Health Initiative data
have been reevaluated to better guide physicians in
patient selection, with risks being reevaluated and strat-
ified by age and time since menopause.
8
New guide-
lines have been created, with the consensus that MHT
is safest for those younger than 60 years and within
10 years of menopause
4,6
and might be continued for
some women after age 65.
9
This is clinically relevant, as
new evidence is emerging indicating that many women
continue to experience substantial symptoms well into
their 60s, with a mean duration of VMS of more than
7 years and extending beyond 11 years for many.
10
With
no fixed duration of treatment, the guidelines now state
that MHT should be individualized to account for each
patient’s unique risk-benefit profile.
4,6
This article is eligible for Mainpro+ certied
Self-Learning credits. To earn credits, go to
www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro+ link.
This article has been peer reviewed.
Can Fam Physician 2017;63:295-8
La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à
www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro
d’avril 2017 à la page e219.
Many primary care clinicians have had little experi-
ence treating menopausal patients. New guidelines and
position statements, including those from the Society of
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada,
4
the North
American Menopause Society,
7
and the International
Menopause Society,
6
help support health care providers
in caring for menopausal women. These statements by
leading organizations in mature women’s health include
recommendations that certain questions be asked of all
perimenopausal women.
4,6,7
However, existing meno-
pausal questionnaires, such as the Menopause-Specific
Quality of Life Questionnaire and Greene Climacteric
Scale, are lengthy and might not be ideal for use in the
primary care setting.
With the needs of busy primary care physicians in
mind, I have developed a quick menopausal screen-
ing questionnaire called the Menopause Quick 6 (MQ6)
(Figure 1).
4,6
This 6-question scale assesses menopausal
symptoms for which there are evidence-based treatment
options while providing a patient-centred assessment
to guide treatment choices. This short questionnaire,
written in lay language, can be used during any clinical
encounter, including a periodic health examination.
These 6 questions were selected because they elicit
helpful information that can guide management deci-
2,4,6,10-12
sions, as described in Table 1.
Putting the MQ6 into practice
The MQ6 was designed to be a quick and efficient tool
for primary care practice. The information elicited from
the 6 questions can guide evidence-based treatment
decisions, as set out in the algorithm in Figure 2.
5
As the algorithm specifies, when hormone therapy
is indicated and there are no contraindications to MHT,
then a transdermal preparation, which avoids first-pass
hepatic metabolism, is recommended for women with
comorbidities that increase cardiovascular risk, includ-
ing risk of venous thromboembolism or stroke (based
on observational data).
11
As the progestogen in the MHT regimen provides
endometrial protection, patients who have undergone
a hysterectomy require only estrogen therapy. When
endometrial protection is required, the use of either
estrogen-progestogen therapy or a tissue-selective
estrogen complex is recommended.
4
A tissue-selective
estrogen complex recently approved for use in Canada
combines conjugated equine estrogen with a selective