Question: Does “might” make “right”? If so, why do some people think otherwise? If
not, what is the difference between “power” and “authority”
(Politics/Sociology/History/Laws)
Explanation: A question like this is useful for assessing a candidate’s critical thinking skills,
ethical reasoning, and understanding of political theories. The question delves into the
fundamental debate about the relationship between power and morality, exploring the
concept of "might makes right" and its implications. The interviewer wants to gauge
whether the interviewee can articulate their stance on this philosophical issue and whether
they can recognize opposing perspectives on the matter. Additionally, the latter part of the
question, regarding the difference between "power" and "authority," seeks to evaluate the
candidate's comprehension of core political concepts. This is also a good chance for the
interviewee to demonstrate background knowledge. Overall, the question helps the
interviewer gauge the intellectual depth and analytical skills of the interviewee in the realm
of political thought.
Question: Where do you see International Law in fifty years’ time?
(Law/Politics/Economics)
Explanation: By asking about the future of international law, the interviewer seeks to gauge
the candidate's ability to analyze and predict potential developments in the field. The
question also evaluates the candidate's awareness of current geopolitical trends,
technological advancements, and socioeconomic factors that may influence the evolution of
international law over the next five decades. A well-considered response demonstrates the
candidate's capacity to think strategically, recognize emerging challenges, and propose
thoughtful insights on the role of international law in shaping the world's legal, political, and
economic landscape in the future.
Question: What is a monopoly? Are there situations in which monopolies are good?
(Law/Politics/Economics/Business)
Explanation: This question is useful for assessing a candidate's understanding of a basic
economic concept and their ability to critically evaluate complex issues. Enquiring about
monopolies allows the interviewer to gauge the candidate's comprehension of market
structures and their potential implications on competition and welfare. By probing whether
there are situations in which monopolies can be considered beneficial, the interviewer seeks
to identify the applicant's capacity to consider the nuanced political and ethical dimensions
of real-world economic policy. A thoughtful response would demonstrate the candidate's
ability to weigh the pros and cons of monopolistic situations, showing their analytical skills
and grasp of how economic principles intersect with ethical, legal, and political
considerations.
Question: The “developing world” should be given more freedom to pollute, as the
“developed world” was able to pollute during its industrial revolution. Do you agree?
Why or why not? (Law/Politics/Economics/Sociology/Environmental Sciences)
Explanation: This question delves into the complex and contentious topic of environmental
science and global justice. By presenting a comparison between the historical
industrialization of the developed world and the environmental challenges faced by the
developing world today, the interviewer seeks to gauge the candidate's ability to engage in
nuanced moral debates. The response would demonstrate the applicant's capacity to
consider the implications of unequal historical development, environmental responsibilities,
and the necessity for sustainable practices. It also invites the candidate to reflect on the
concept of global justice and the balance between developmental aspirations and
environmental protection in the context of the evolving world.