might have been taken of concurrent
mutinous outbreaks prompted by the
same disinclination to fight Russians,
after fighting Germans, onboard British
warships off Archangel and among
American troops in the same region.
Homesickness and wartime restrictions
were among the reasons why Australian
tars defied their officers in 1919. The
Chilean navy’s revolt had its roots, as
had that of the men of Invergordon, in
the world economic depression, but the
Chilean navy’s revolt is notable as the
first naval mutiny crushed by air bom
-
bardment. Indian sailors in the waning
years of the British Raj staged lower-
deck protests against their officers; the
Canadian fleet developed “a tradition of
mutiny” in the 1930s; and the Chong-
qing mutiny off Manchuria in 1949
“played a pivotal role in the...found-
ing of the People’s Republic of China.”
Each story is briskly told, thoroughly
detailed, and accompanied by compre-
hensive source data. Perhaps fortu-
nately for riddle lovers, the question
persists—what is a mutiny? Many of the
Port Chicago fifty awaiting trial were
bewildered, believing that a mutiny in
-
volved a crew overthrowing its officers
and taking command of the ship.
High-level brass can be just as con
-
fused. At a Senate Armed Services
Committee hearing following the
Vietnam-era disturbances on the U.S.
aircraft carriers Constellation and Kitty
Hawk, the chairman asked Admiral
Elmo Zumwalt, then Chief of Naval
Operations, to define mutiny. Zumwalt
passed that one on to his lawyer. The
chairman wondered aloud if the Caine
mutiny of Herman Wouk’s novel,
though fictional, was not the real thing;
the CNO suggested that what happened
on the Bounty was a genuine mutiny.
This book mentions these troubles on
the American flattops only in passing.
Were all the episodes it covers truly
mutinies? Let the question rest. This is a
fine book, eminently readable, and as
definitive as any work can claim to be
on the still mysterious matter of
mutiny.
LEONARD F. GUTTRIDGE
Alexandria, Virginia
Brown, Stephen R. Scurvy: How a Surgeon, a Mar
-
iner, and a Gentleman Solved the Greatest Medical
Mystery of the Age of Sail. Markham, Ont.:
Thomas Allen, 2003. 254pp. $23.95
The conquest of scurvy played as great a
role as any naval battle in the history of
England’s domination of the world dur-
ing the Age of Sail. Today we under-
stand that scurvy is a condition caused
by dietary deficiency. The typical menu
for a sailor in the eighteenth century
consisted of biscuits, salt beef, salt pork,
dried fish, butter, cheese, peas, and
beer—hardly sources of vitamin C. Ac
-
cording to the 1763 annual register tab
-
ulation of casualties among British
sailors in the Seven Years’ War with
France, of 184,999 men, 133,708 died
from disease, primarily scurvy, while
only 1,512 were killed in action. Such
numbers are hard to comprehend today.
Brown implies that America won its in
-
dependence because the ravages of this
disease prevented the British fleet from
maintaining an effective blockade. Only
a few years later, having conquered
scurvy, the same navy thwarted Napoleon
from mounting an invasion force and
sustained a blockade preventing the
French and Spanish from consolidating
their ships into an effective fleet.
158 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW
C:\WIP\NWCR\NWC Review Autumn 2005.vp
Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:57:52 AM
Color profile: Disabled
Composite Default screen
1
Maruyama and Brown: Scurvy: How a Surgeon, a Mariner, and a Gentleman Solved the Grea
Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2005