are core to all advanced nursing practice roles" (AACN, 2006, p. 8). Clarifying recommendations
regarding the DNP were published in 2015, which provided clarification on the DNP project,
practice hours and experiences, and curriculum considerations (AACN, 2015).
Although doctoral preparation for APRNs is a worthy goal, it is not yet clear when it will become a
mandatory degree for entry-level practice. In updating its Essentials for Master's Education in
Nursing (2011), AACN acknowledges that "Master's education remains a critical component of the
nursing education trajectory to prepare nurses who can address the gaps resulting from growing
healthcare needs and that...these Essentials are core for all master's programs in nursing and
provide the necessary curricular elements and framework, regardless of focus, major, or intended
practice setting" (AACN, 2011, p. 3). Currently, in 2017, there are a number of NNP programs
continuing to provide education and preparation at the master’s level.
Although APRNs are acknowledged as integral members of the healthcare system, there remains a
lack of consistency in regulations across state boundaries in the United States. The barriers to
practice created by the lack of standardization exacerbate the shortage of qualified NNPs that
already exists. With the release of the 2008 APRN Consensus Model, nurse practitioner (NP)
organizations and educational facilities have undertaken efforts to incorporate the model's
components. "Within education, NP programs have focused on changes to align educational tracks
with the NP populations delineated in the model. National organizations have supported these
efforts through collaborative work on the NP competencies that guide curriculum development"
(NONPF, 2013, p. 5).
NONPF, with representation from the major NP organizations, has developed core competencies
for the six population foci described in the APRN Consensus Model. These "NP Core
Competencies integrate and build upon existing master's and DNP core competencies and are
guidelines for educational programs" (NONPF, 2011, amended 2012, p.1). Each individual
population focus within the broader category of advanced practice nursing is charged with
delineating more specific standards of education for its own members. Thus, NANNP, a division of
NANN, defines the educational and preparation standards for those pursuing the NNP role.
In conclusion, the framework for NNP education is built upon the broad standards for advanced
practice nursing (AACN, 2006, 2011) and the evaluation criteria for nurse practitioner programs
(National Task Force on Nurse Practitioner Education, 2016). This document reflects the consensus
of the work summarized above and presented in the Criteria for Evaluation of Nurse Practitioner
Programs (National Task Force on Quality Nurse Practitioner Education, 2016), The Consensus
Model for APRN Regulation (APRN Consensus Work Group & NCSBN APRN Advisory
Committee, 2008), Population-Focused Nurse Practitioner Competencies (NONPF, 2013), The
Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice (AACN, 2006), and The
Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing (AACN, 2011).
This document describes the minimum standards necessary for preparation of NNPs. These
standards are intended to be used in conjunction with other accreditation standards and tools in the
evaluation of graduate educational programs or tracks and reflect updated guidelines for Evaluation
Criteria for Nurse Practitioner Programs (National Task Force on Nurse Practitioner Education,
2016). This edition also adds additional information on use of simulation and addresses educational
criteria regarding care of the infant through the age of 2 years.
Designing or revising programs according to the recommendations in this guideline will ensure that