Silviculture Handbook
April 2016 62-13 HB24315.62
7 Valuing non-timber forest resources
Forests are often valued for their non-timber resources such as wildlife habitat or recreation. Valuing
non-timber resources is generally expressed as an annual dollar benefit. The WDNR forest management
guidelines state that “There are many benefits from owning and managing forests. Stocks and bonds are
usually purchased for the sole purpose of making money, and their financial performance is judged on
that basis alone. But forests are more than mere collections of trees, and landowners benefit from a wide
array of non-timber goods and services like berries and mushrooms, recreational enjoyment, aesthetics,
water quality, and wildlife. Some of these are traded in the marketplace, for example income from
leasing hunting rights, but most are not, and there is no easy way to determine their value to the
landowner. These non-market benefits can have significant value though, as evidenced by the prices
paid for forestland. Even land that is a long distance from a population center and has no unusual
attractions, such as lakes or streams, will typically be bought and sold for much more than its value for
timber production alone. Investment analysis that focuses only on costs and returns from timber
production will ignore important non-market benefits, and will provide an incomplete measure of total
investment performance” (WDNR, 2011).
Non-timber values are generally defined as direct, indirect and existence values. Direct use values are
things that involve direct human interaction. For example, non-timber forest products, recreation and
hunting are all direct use values. Indirect use refers to values that do not require human involvement.
Existence values are the values that people have for non-timber resources existing. Existence values are
often cultural uses or the importance of places. Most non-timber forest valuation focuses on direct and
indirect use values. Not considering the non-timber values can create problems with inefficient
allocation of resources or uninformed management decisions.
8 Forest economics in the value chain
The forest industry has an extensive history in Wisconsin and to continue forestry in the future we need
to maintain economically-viable and ecologically sustainable returns. Forest economics can help make
fully informed management decisions for landowners, loggers, log buyers, truckers, primary and
secondary processors and communities.
8.1 Landowners
Forest landowners are the base of the economic chain. Private forest land owners may work with
foresters to develop forest management plans and conduct timber sales. The timber sales can be
purchased by loggers, timber haulers, primary processors, and even secondary processors. After the sale
is purchased a logger harvests the selected trees, a timber hauler delivers them to a mill, which processes
the logs into any of several possible products. At all stages of the value-chain the owner of the timber or
logs tries to steer the products into their highest value use. This optimization is unique for everyone as
costs and benefits are different and units may be difficult to define. Foresters can help by looking for
ways to remain flexible in writing and interpreting management plans, lay out of harvests and working
with members of the forest industry.